From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04628C4332B for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A522072E for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:12:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1584897141; bh=RNQAFnyFMkXLrBsta3/IXISWmGcuSDF4CGTlFiPimsM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=gvTV7ErB/O1yowGll70RGBRaWeL9rjqfaFUo5ivwMiYCmKdM09k212Br7Apim+yXo aJITvtFuFftiCPypKDBHSLVwZRJcA1nVVDtqR6jnLrK8H/enHyk1+4ILFWg61Zur+v K+3hb9X9W0l7TDz6Cu5O/O2pyv8uPDdxZGeZPJE4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726583AbgCVRMV (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 13:12:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46452 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725972AbgCVRMV (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 13:12:21 -0400 Received: from archlinux (cpc149474-cmbg20-2-0-cust94.5-4.cable.virginm.net [82.4.196.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D59E20724; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:12:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1584897140; bh=RNQAFnyFMkXLrBsta3/IXISWmGcuSDF4CGTlFiPimsM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AoVCimXv2hBVMlntlIz4eP20CJSDK+1ZzwBhN90oBM31QC11kgS8a45kUanDl7hVH 0OUdPRj0WkcANaFjta+Wk/yMuiiy9TgAgTdQ+pFnmO+UR2VAi/tu6xpPbdOnhiMnJQ r574M90BGIjqWUlvpMHKUTPZY5SHEm/k4snPpInM= Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:12:16 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] iio: pressure: bmp280: Tolerate IRQ before registering Message-ID: <20200322171216.3260cd37@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20200317101813.30829-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <20200317101813.30829-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:18:09 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > With DEBUG_SHIRQ enabled we have a kernel crash > > [ 116.482696] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 > > ... > > [ 116.606571] Call Trace: > [ 116.609023] > [ 116.611047] complete+0x34/0x50 > [ 116.614206] bmp085_eoc_irq+0x9/0x10 [bmp280] > > because DEBUG_SHIRQ mechanism fires an IRQ before registration and drivers > ought to be able to handle an interrupt happening before request_irq() returns. > > Fixes: aae953949651 ("iio: pressure: bmp280: add support for BMP085 EOC interrupt") > Cc: Linus Walleij > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Hmm. Nasty corner case but fair enough to fix it up. I guess we should audit other drivers for similar paths... > --- > drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c > index 29c209cc1108..5e229b95308e 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c > @@ -712,8 +712,7 @@ static int bmp180_measure(struct bmp280_data *data, u8 ctrl_meas) > unsigned int delay_us; > unsigned int ctrl; > > - if (data->use_eoc) > - init_completion(&data->done); > + reinit_completion(&data->done); reinit on the completion when we don't even have an interrupt (hence data->use_eoc == false) seems excessive. Why did you drop the conditional? Jonathan > > ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, BMP280_REG_CTRL_MEAS, ctrl_meas); > if (ret) > @@ -969,6 +968,9 @@ static int bmp085_fetch_eoc_irq(struct device *dev, > "trying to enforce it\n"); > irq_trig = IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING; > } > + > + init_completion(&data->done); > + > ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, > irq, > bmp085_eoc_irq,