From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
Stefan Popa <stefan.popa@analog.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: dac: ad5592r-base: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device lock
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 19:38:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200521193825.76c36f8a@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200520120207.46034-1-sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>
On Wed, 20 May 2020 15:02:01 +0300
Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com> wrote:
> As part of the general cleanup of indio_dev->mlock, this change replaces
> it with a local lock on the device's state structure.
> This also removes unused iio_dev pointers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
the autobuilders to play with it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
> index e2110113e884..410e90e5f75f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ static void ad5592r_gpio_cleanup(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> static int ad5592r_reset(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> {
> struct gpio_desc *gpio;
> - struct iio_dev *iio_dev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
>
> gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(st->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> if (IS_ERR(gpio))
> @@ -166,10 +165,10 @@ static int ad5592r_reset(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> udelay(1);
> gpiod_set_value(gpio, 1);
> } else {
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> /* Writing this magic value resets the device */
> st->ops->reg_write(st, AD5592R_REG_RESET, 0xdac);
> - mutex_unlock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> }
>
> udelay(250);
> @@ -197,7 +196,6 @@ static int ad5592r_set_channel_modes(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> const struct ad5592r_rw_ops *ops = st->ops;
> int ret;
> unsigned i;
> - struct iio_dev *iio_dev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> u8 pulldown = 0, tristate = 0, dac = 0, adc = 0;
> u16 read_back;
>
> @@ -247,7 +245,7 @@ static int ad5592r_set_channel_modes(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> }
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> /* Pull down unused pins to GND */
> ret = ops->reg_write(st, AD5592R_REG_PULLDOWN, pulldown);
> @@ -285,7 +283,7 @@ static int ad5592r_set_channel_modes(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> ret = -EIO;
>
> err_unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -314,11 +312,11 @@ static int ad5592r_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> if (!chan->output)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> ret = st->ops->write_dac(st, chan->channel, val);
> if (!ret)
> st->cached_dac[chan->channel] = val;
> - mutex_unlock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> return ret;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> if (chan->type == IIO_VOLTAGE) {
> @@ -333,12 +331,12 @@ static int ad5592r_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> else
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> ret = st->ops->reg_read(st, AD5592R_REG_CTRL,
> &st->cached_gp_ctrl);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - mutex_unlock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -360,7 +358,7 @@ static int ad5592r_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>
> ret = st->ops->reg_write(st, AD5592R_REG_CTRL,
> st->cached_gp_ctrl);
> - mutex_unlock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -382,7 +380,7 @@ static int ad5592r_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>
> switch (m) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> if (!chan->output) {
> ret = st->ops->read_adc(st, chan->channel, &read_val);
> @@ -419,7 +417,7 @@ static int ad5592r_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> } else {
> int mult;
>
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> if (chan->output)
> mult = !!(st->cached_gp_ctrl &
> @@ -437,7 +435,7 @@ static int ad5592r_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:
> ret = ad5592r_get_vref(st);
>
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> if (st->cached_gp_ctrl & AD5592R_REG_CTRL_ADC_RANGE)
> *val = (-34365 * 25) / ret;
> @@ -450,7 +448,7 @@ static int ad5592r_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> }
>
> unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -625,6 +623,8 @@ int ad5592r_probe(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> iio_dev->info = &ad5592r_info;
> iio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>
> + mutex_init(&st->lock);
> +
> ad5592r_init_scales(st, ad5592r_get_vref(st));
>
> ret = ad5592r_reset(st);
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.h b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.h
> index 4774e4cd9c11..23dac2f1ff8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct ad5592r_state {
> struct regulator *reg;
> struct gpio_chip gpiochip;
> struct mutex gpio_lock; /* Protect cached gpio_out, gpio_val, etc. */
> + struct mutex lock;
> unsigned int num_channels;
> const struct ad5592r_rw_ops *ops;
> int scale_avail[2][2];
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-21 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-20 6:18 [PATCH] iio: dac: ad5592r-base: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device lock Sergiu Cuciurean
2020-05-20 8:46 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-05-20 12:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Sergiu Cuciurean
2020-05-21 18:38 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200521193825.76c36f8a@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com \
--cc=stefan.popa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).