* [PATCH] iio: at91_adc: remove usage of iio_priv_to_dev() helper
@ 2020-05-25 10:25 Alexandru Ardelean
2020-05-31 14:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexandru Ardelean @ 2020-05-25 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-iio, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Cc: jic23, nicolas.ferre, alexandre.belloni, ludovic.desroches,
Alexandru Ardelean
We may want to get rid of the iio_priv_to_dev() helper. The reason is that
we will hide some of the members of the iio_dev structure (to prevent
drivers from accessing them directly), and that will also mean hiding the
implementation of the iio_priv_to_dev() helper inside the IIO core.
Hiding the implementation of iio_priv_to_dev() implies that some fast-paths
may not be fast anymore, so a general idea is to try to get rid of the
iio_priv_to_dev() altogether.
The iio_priv() helper won't be affected by the rework, as the iio_dev
struct will keep a reference to the private information.
For this driver, not using iio_priv_to_dev(), means reworking some paths to
pass the iio device and using iio_priv() to access the private information.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
---
drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
index 0368b6dc6d60..896af58e88bc 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
@@ -287,13 +287,13 @@ static void handle_adc_eoc_trigger(int irq, struct iio_dev *idev)
}
}
-static int at91_ts_sample(struct at91_adc_state *st)
+static int at91_ts_sample(struct iio_dev *idev)
{
+ struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
unsigned int xscale, yscale, reg, z1, z2;
unsigned int x, y, pres, xpos, ypos;
unsigned int rxp = 1;
unsigned int factor = 1000;
- struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
unsigned int xyz_mask_bits = st->res;
unsigned int xyz_mask = (1 << xyz_mask_bits) - 1;
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_adc_9x5_interrupt(int irq, void *private)
if (status & AT91_ADC_ISR_PENS) {
/* validate data by pen contact */
- at91_ts_sample(st);
+ at91_ts_sample(idev);
} else {
/* triggered by event that is no pen contact, just read
* them to clean the interrupt and discard all.
@@ -737,10 +737,10 @@ static int at91_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *idev,
return -EINVAL;
}
-static int at91_adc_of_get_resolution(struct at91_adc_state *st,
+static int at91_adc_of_get_resolution(struct iio_dev *idev,
struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
+ struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
int count, i, ret = 0;
char *res_name, *s;
@@ -866,10 +866,10 @@ static int at91_adc_probe_dt_ts(struct device_node *node,
}
}
-static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct at91_adc_state *st,
+static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct iio_dev *idev,
struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
+ struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
struct device_node *trig_node;
int i = 0, ret;
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct at91_adc_state *st,
}
st->vref_mv = prop;
- ret = at91_adc_of_get_resolution(st, pdev);
+ ret = at91_adc_of_get_resolution(idev, pdev);
if (ret)
goto error_ret;
@@ -1010,9 +1010,9 @@ static void atmel_ts_close(struct input_dev *dev)
at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IDR, AT91RL_ADC_IER_PEN);
}
-static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct at91_adc_state *st, u32 adc_clk_khz)
+static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct iio_dev *idev, u32 adc_clk_khz)
{
- struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
+ struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
u32 reg = 0;
u32 tssctim = 0;
int i = 0;
@@ -1085,11 +1085,11 @@ static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct at91_adc_state *st, u32 adc_clk_khz)
return 0;
}
-static int at91_ts_register(struct at91_adc_state *st,
+static int at91_ts_register(struct iio_dev *idev,
struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
struct input_dev *input;
- struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
int ret;
input = input_allocate_device();
@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
st = iio_priv(idev);
if (pdev->dev.of_node)
- ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(st, pdev);
+ ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(idev, pdev);
else
ret = at91_adc_probe_pdata(st, pdev);
@@ -1301,11 +1301,11 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto error_disable_adc_clk;
}
} else {
- ret = at91_ts_register(st, pdev);
+ ret = at91_ts_register(idev, pdev);
if (ret)
goto error_disable_adc_clk;
- at91_ts_hw_init(st, adc_clk_khz);
+ at91_ts_hw_init(idev, adc_clk_khz);
}
ret = iio_device_register(idev);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] iio: at91_adc: remove usage of iio_priv_to_dev() helper
2020-05-25 10:25 [PATCH] iio: at91_adc: remove usage of iio_priv_to_dev() helper Alexandru Ardelean
@ 2020-05-31 14:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-06-19 8:02 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2020-05-31 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandru Ardelean
Cc: linux-iio, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, nicolas.ferre,
alexandre.belloni, ludovic.desroches
On Mon, 25 May 2020 13:25:13 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
> We may want to get rid of the iio_priv_to_dev() helper. The reason is that
> we will hide some of the members of the iio_dev structure (to prevent
> drivers from accessing them directly), and that will also mean hiding the
> implementation of the iio_priv_to_dev() helper inside the IIO core.
>
> Hiding the implementation of iio_priv_to_dev() implies that some fast-paths
> may not be fast anymore, so a general idea is to try to get rid of the
> iio_priv_to_dev() altogether.
> The iio_priv() helper won't be affected by the rework, as the iio_dev
> struct will keep a reference to the private information.
>
> For this driver, not using iio_priv_to_dev(), means reworking some paths to
> pass the iio device and using iio_priv() to access the private information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Looks good to me. Will leave it a bit longer though to potentially
get some people more familiar with the driver to sanity check it.
Poke me after the usual couple of weeks if I seem to have lost it
down the back of the sofa.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> index 0368b6dc6d60..896af58e88bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> @@ -287,13 +287,13 @@ static void handle_adc_eoc_trigger(int irq, struct iio_dev *idev)
> }
> }
>
> -static int at91_ts_sample(struct at91_adc_state *st)
> +static int at91_ts_sample(struct iio_dev *idev)
> {
> + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> unsigned int xscale, yscale, reg, z1, z2;
> unsigned int x, y, pres, xpos, ypos;
> unsigned int rxp = 1;
> unsigned int factor = 1000;
> - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
>
> unsigned int xyz_mask_bits = st->res;
> unsigned int xyz_mask = (1 << xyz_mask_bits) - 1;
> @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_adc_9x5_interrupt(int irq, void *private)
>
> if (status & AT91_ADC_ISR_PENS) {
> /* validate data by pen contact */
> - at91_ts_sample(st);
> + at91_ts_sample(idev);
> } else {
> /* triggered by event that is no pen contact, just read
> * them to clean the interrupt and discard all.
> @@ -737,10 +737,10 @@ static int at91_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *idev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> -static int at91_adc_of_get_resolution(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> +static int at91_adc_of_get_resolution(struct iio_dev *idev,
> struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> int count, i, ret = 0;
> char *res_name, *s;
> @@ -866,10 +866,10 @@ static int at91_adc_probe_dt_ts(struct device_node *node,
> }
> }
>
> -static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> +static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct iio_dev *idev,
> struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct device_node *trig_node;
> int i = 0, ret;
> @@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> }
> st->vref_mv = prop;
>
> - ret = at91_adc_of_get_resolution(st, pdev);
> + ret = at91_adc_of_get_resolution(idev, pdev);
> if (ret)
> goto error_ret;
>
> @@ -1010,9 +1010,9 @@ static void atmel_ts_close(struct input_dev *dev)
> at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IDR, AT91RL_ADC_IER_PEN);
> }
>
> -static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct at91_adc_state *st, u32 adc_clk_khz)
> +static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct iio_dev *idev, u32 adc_clk_khz)
> {
> - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> u32 reg = 0;
> u32 tssctim = 0;
> int i = 0;
> @@ -1085,11 +1085,11 @@ static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct at91_adc_state *st, u32 adc_clk_khz)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int at91_ts_register(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> +static int at91_ts_register(struct iio_dev *idev,
> struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> struct input_dev *input;
> - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> int ret;
>
> input = input_allocate_device();
> @@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> st = iio_priv(idev);
>
> if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> - ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(st, pdev);
> + ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(idev, pdev);
> else
> ret = at91_adc_probe_pdata(st, pdev);
>
> @@ -1301,11 +1301,11 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto error_disable_adc_clk;
> }
> } else {
> - ret = at91_ts_register(st, pdev);
> + ret = at91_ts_register(idev, pdev);
> if (ret)
> goto error_disable_adc_clk;
>
> - at91_ts_hw_init(st, adc_clk_khz);
> + at91_ts_hw_init(idev, adc_clk_khz);
> }
>
> ret = iio_device_register(idev);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] iio: at91_adc: remove usage of iio_priv_to_dev() helper
2020-05-31 14:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
@ 2020-06-19 8:02 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-06-20 16:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ardelean, Alexandru @ 2020-06-19 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jic23
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, nicolas.ferre, ludovic.desroches, linux-kernel,
linux-iio, alexandre.belloni
On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 15:42 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> [External]
>
> On Mon, 25 May 2020 13:25:13 +0300
> Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
>
> > We may want to get rid of the iio_priv_to_dev() helper. The reason is
> > that
> > we will hide some of the members of the iio_dev structure (to prevent
> > drivers from accessing them directly), and that will also mean hiding
> > the
> > implementation of the iio_priv_to_dev() helper inside the IIO core.
> >
> > Hiding the implementation of iio_priv_to_dev() implies that some fast-
> > paths
> > may not be fast anymore, so a general idea is to try to get rid of the
> > iio_priv_to_dev() altogether.
> > The iio_priv() helper won't be affected by the rework, as the iio_dev
> > struct will keep a reference to the private information.
> >
> > For this driver, not using iio_priv_to_dev(), means reworking some
> > paths to
> > pass the iio device and using iio_priv() to access the private
> > information.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
> Looks good to me. Will leave it a bit longer though to potentially
> get some people more familiar with the driver to sanity check it.
>
> Poke me after the usual couple of weeks if I seem to have lost it
> down the back of the sofa.
>
ping on this
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> > index 0368b6dc6d60..896af58e88bc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> > @@ -287,13 +287,13 @@ static void handle_adc_eoc_trigger(int irq,
> > struct iio_dev *idev)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -static int at91_ts_sample(struct at91_adc_state *st)
> > +static int at91_ts_sample(struct iio_dev *idev)
> > {
> > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > unsigned int xscale, yscale, reg, z1, z2;
> > unsigned int x, y, pres, xpos, ypos;
> > unsigned int rxp = 1;
> > unsigned int factor = 1000;
> > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> >
> > unsigned int xyz_mask_bits = st->res;
> > unsigned int xyz_mask = (1 << xyz_mask_bits) - 1;
> > @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_adc_9x5_interrupt(int irq,
> > void *private)
> >
> > if (status & AT91_ADC_ISR_PENS) {
> > /* validate data by pen contact */
> > - at91_ts_sample(st);
> > + at91_ts_sample(idev);
> > } else {
> > /* triggered by event that is no pen contact, just
> > read
> > * them to clean the interrupt and discard all.
> > @@ -737,10 +737,10 @@ static int at91_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev
> > *idev,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > -static int at91_adc_of_get_resolution(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> > +static int at91_adc_of_get_resolution(struct iio_dev *idev,
> > struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > int count, i, ret = 0;
> > char *res_name, *s;
> > @@ -866,10 +866,10 @@ static int at91_adc_probe_dt_ts(struct
> > device_node *node,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> > +static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct iio_dev *idev,
> > struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > struct device_node *trig_node;
> > int i = 0, ret;
> > @@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct at91_adc_state
> > *st,
> > }
> > st->vref_mv = prop;
> >
> > - ret = at91_adc_of_get_resolution(st, pdev);
> > + ret = at91_adc_of_get_resolution(idev, pdev);
> > if (ret)
> > goto error_ret;
> >
> > @@ -1010,9 +1010,9 @@ static void atmel_ts_close(struct input_dev *dev)
> > at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IDR, AT91RL_ADC_IER_PEN);
> > }
> >
> > -static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct at91_adc_state *st, u32 adc_clk_khz)
> > +static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct iio_dev *idev, u32 adc_clk_khz)
> > {
> > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > u32 reg = 0;
> > u32 tssctim = 0;
> > int i = 0;
> > @@ -1085,11 +1085,11 @@ static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct
> > at91_adc_state *st, u32 adc_clk_khz)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int at91_ts_register(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> > +static int at91_ts_register(struct iio_dev *idev,
> > struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > struct input_dev *input;
> > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > int ret;
> >
> > input = input_allocate_device();
> > @@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > st = iio_priv(idev);
> >
> > if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> > - ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(st, pdev);
> > + ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(idev, pdev);
> > else
> > ret = at91_adc_probe_pdata(st, pdev);
> >
> > @@ -1301,11 +1301,11 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > goto error_disable_adc_clk;
> > }
> > } else {
> > - ret = at91_ts_register(st, pdev);
> > + ret = at91_ts_register(idev, pdev);
> > if (ret)
> > goto error_disable_adc_clk;
> >
> > - at91_ts_hw_init(st, adc_clk_khz);
> > + at91_ts_hw_init(idev, adc_clk_khz);
> > }
> >
> > ret = iio_device_register(idev);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] iio: at91_adc: remove usage of iio_priv_to_dev() helper
2020-06-19 8:02 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
@ 2020-06-20 16:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2020-06-20 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ardelean, Alexandru
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, nicolas.ferre, ludovic.desroches, linux-kernel,
linux-iio, alexandre.belloni
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 08:02:55 +0000
"Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 15:42 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > [External]
> >
> > On Mon, 25 May 2020 13:25:13 +0300
> > Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
> >
> > > We may want to get rid of the iio_priv_to_dev() helper. The reason is
> > > that
> > > we will hide some of the members of the iio_dev structure (to prevent
> > > drivers from accessing them directly), and that will also mean hiding
> > > the
> > > implementation of the iio_priv_to_dev() helper inside the IIO core.
> > >
> > > Hiding the implementation of iio_priv_to_dev() implies that some fast-
> > > paths
> > > may not be fast anymore, so a general idea is to try to get rid of the
> > > iio_priv_to_dev() altogether.
> > > The iio_priv() helper won't be affected by the rework, as the iio_dev
> > > struct will keep a reference to the private information.
> > >
> > > For this driver, not using iio_priv_to_dev(), means reworking some
> > > paths to
> > > pass the iio device and using iio_priv() to access the private
> > > information.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
> > Looks good to me. Will leave it a bit longer though to potentially
> > get some people more familiar with the driver to sanity check it.
> >
> > Poke me after the usual couple of weeks if I seem to have lost it
> > down the back of the sofa.
> >
>
> ping on this
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
the autobuilders to play with it
Thanks,
J
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> > > index 0368b6dc6d60..896af58e88bc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> > > @@ -287,13 +287,13 @@ static void handle_adc_eoc_trigger(int irq,
> > > struct iio_dev *idev)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int at91_ts_sample(struct at91_adc_state *st)
> > > +static int at91_ts_sample(struct iio_dev *idev)
> > > {
> > > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > > unsigned int xscale, yscale, reg, z1, z2;
> > > unsigned int x, y, pres, xpos, ypos;
> > > unsigned int rxp = 1;
> > > unsigned int factor = 1000;
> > > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > >
> > > unsigned int xyz_mask_bits = st->res;
> > > unsigned int xyz_mask = (1 << xyz_mask_bits) - 1;
> > > @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_adc_9x5_interrupt(int irq,
> > > void *private)
> > >
> > > if (status & AT91_ADC_ISR_PENS) {
> > > /* validate data by pen contact */
> > > - at91_ts_sample(st);
> > > + at91_ts_sample(idev);
> > > } else {
> > > /* triggered by event that is no pen contact, just
> > > read
> > > * them to clean the interrupt and discard all.
> > > @@ -737,10 +737,10 @@ static int at91_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev
> > > *idev,
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int at91_adc_of_get_resolution(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> > > +static int at91_adc_of_get_resolution(struct iio_dev *idev,
> > > struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > {
> > > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > int count, i, ret = 0;
> > > char *res_name, *s;
> > > @@ -866,10 +866,10 @@ static int at91_adc_probe_dt_ts(struct
> > > device_node *node,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> > > +static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct iio_dev *idev,
> > > struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > {
> > > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > > struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > struct device_node *trig_node;
> > > int i = 0, ret;
> > > @@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct at91_adc_state
> > > *st,
> > > }
> > > st->vref_mv = prop;
> > >
> > > - ret = at91_adc_of_get_resolution(st, pdev);
> > > + ret = at91_adc_of_get_resolution(idev, pdev);
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto error_ret;
> > >
> > > @@ -1010,9 +1010,9 @@ static void atmel_ts_close(struct input_dev *dev)
> > > at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IDR, AT91RL_ADC_IER_PEN);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct at91_adc_state *st, u32 adc_clk_khz)
> > > +static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct iio_dev *idev, u32 adc_clk_khz)
> > > {
> > > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > > u32 reg = 0;
> > > u32 tssctim = 0;
> > > int i = 0;
> > > @@ -1085,11 +1085,11 @@ static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct
> > > at91_adc_state *st, u32 adc_clk_khz)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int at91_ts_register(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> > > +static int at91_ts_register(struct iio_dev *idev,
> > > struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > {
> > > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > > struct input_dev *input;
> > > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > input = input_allocate_device();
> > > @@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev)
> > > st = iio_priv(idev);
> > >
> > > if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> > > - ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(st, pdev);
> > > + ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(idev, pdev);
> > > else
> > > ret = at91_adc_probe_pdata(st, pdev);
> > >
> > > @@ -1301,11 +1301,11 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > goto error_disable_adc_clk;
> > > }
> > > } else {
> > > - ret = at91_ts_register(st, pdev);
> > > + ret = at91_ts_register(idev, pdev);
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto error_disable_adc_clk;
> > >
> > > - at91_ts_hw_init(st, adc_clk_khz);
> > > + at91_ts_hw_init(idev, adc_clk_khz);
> > > }
> > >
> > > ret = iio_device_register(idev);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-20 16:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-25 10:25 [PATCH] iio: at91_adc: remove usage of iio_priv_to_dev() helper Alexandru Ardelean
2020-05-31 14:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-06-19 8:02 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-06-20 16:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).