From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B19C433E0 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855F1206C0 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:46:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593463567; bh=UCUfaDjUVmlDpTU3LRBvAL1Yi4B0vDt8IAFLorzpyrA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=ImJCTDKNi0qsurhe9tA/MRPJfktNX+6UQZUlNfw4Ul10F4amdNKaGxIjysC1UrDBp 0/uE10VMeRV3pnjBZuwNhIYxxWVwdG8XxIlQ7pFrJZLho0LBgOR078om3GV49rZLqF FRc8I6OAFkNf2orp3T1pL5ksyNP+CpDTj70iSyNs= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731692AbgF2UqG (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:46:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43366 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731559AbgF2TNx (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:13:53 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x541.google.com (mail-ed1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::541]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62D95C08ECB9; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 23:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x541.google.com with SMTP id n2so2833421edr.5; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 23:52:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MJNvhIQCteTm5VtFSyzzsWJRKykcFhaBMFS+SgAaulE=; b=uNI53+DW4ONYlbuHphXC9uYMySsEMjyWfy5sBfX+nJbg4OS9i4+HWrsrE1tWTK/Hef 02OIFYUVziudbAsKub4UzWh1xRVhXjYE5FnNrbLcGcXQ7qr+7Ilpk6XFAzB9kDwAr/QX oVGpNc84c8tKZEO/yPLs7jAyvT8qSv0+gbiIG00uGK+Gwk026vO4birTebkPxwjQCQhf /tHgX4kwxIn/+TzpFtRp457rHdY1XnQlQxPZnPfuwaj4Aa1o+VvZR5OWzyPUY0G5Aev4 cvLIOMRCe4/yYTnMIyWSIVYfHH2FtVDSQs1Xw2AFfqOuYKr//f3g2FyzEjOUPiRn0ykP zNZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Z9dACPIuq4ShX8Zn+MRhc06Y3FtBXyvPT6EdT5VC2gN9OcQ9L 8+/oJ1CkwU6vJkS4NbTiDc0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9FZnwCiOCE7JrbDHqCcdYHvx1EqL2R+gxeefz5/+dK9PWLHMqdziIkts4ezYexqkOwTWX0w== X-Received: by 2002:a50:f047:: with SMTP id u7mr16877181edl.274.1593413532938; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 23:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kozik-lap ([194.230.155.195]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m14sm9438582ejx.80.2020.06.28.23.52.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 23:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:52:10 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Rob Herring , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: bmc150_magn: Document and fix missing compatibles Message-ID: <20200629065210.GB5879@kozik-lap> References: <20200622060110.23192-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20200627144359.1ae30bb0@archlinux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200627144359.1ae30bb0@archlinux> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 02:43:59PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:01:09 +0200 > Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > The driver supports also BMC156B and BMM150B but these compatibles had > > redundant suffix "_magn". Add existing compatibles marking them > > deprecated along with adding a new, proper one for this family of > > devices. > Thanks for tidying this up. > > The BMC156B is a dual magnetometer and accelerometer chip > so for that one the _magn postfix probably is needed. > > Or am I missing something? > > The way this does SPI is rather odd but seems to be the same as the bmc150 > (two chips with non overlapping register maps). You're right, only one compatible should be trimmed from suffix. I'll send v3. Best regards, Krzysztof