From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38B9C43465 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 15:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7462F20897 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 15:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=metafoo.de header.i=@metafoo.de header.b="N4km3ir9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726285AbgITPCj (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Sep 2020 11:02:39 -0400 Received: from www381.your-server.de ([78.46.137.84]:49226 "EHLO www381.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726267AbgITPCj (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Sep 2020 11:02:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=metafoo.de; s=default2002; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=foneasnavtMT52V3FviDIu+tgjfSglY1rxKb/kPfH+s=; b=N4km3ir99X6FYjL8u5/mOrY0rq ReRh53fN+8XfpevYX86VhcvlsG6A/qOFcicUxrxJO7kLaRWm/PxWXsx4pvbO7ChRdwjW1vQ30MfH8 RZGJd9OKqbZtIUWAFX3bM3Iy3HNYnUUxsmpNa0Ec+i3q99ec87MThNooVJuGjnSp5SpjimhQkSXIj OWF69F6GVenhG05UBhUCd77lmw19BMP6389w+HaWdBwP2ewyS2tx9ZaO6uzAkvBmQU1LHvNYsh4rv 0Lk6AFHdAqBBrG9mxhKlfipI6371Z5xumDjT9WKJrz4bFAiGaVa4i2QKJx8h1FLGgQdHBkwFqTuX+ +4C/qUAg==; Received: from sslproxy03.your-server.de ([88.198.220.132]) by www381.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1kK0rI-0002LM-Lx; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:02:32 +0200 Received: from [2001:a61:259b:1201:9e5c:8eff:fe01:8578] by sslproxy03.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kK0rI-0001Z5-Hy; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:02:32 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] iio:trigger: Remove re-poll logic. To: Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Christian Eggers , Jonathan Cameron References: <20200920132548.196452-1-jic23@kernel.org> From: Lars-Peter Clausen Message-ID: <78141dee-33a2-c28d-2e80-38918c03f81d@metafoo.de> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:02:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200920132548.196452-1-jic23@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Authenticated-Sender: lars@metafoo.de X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.102.4/25933/Sun Sep 20 15:50:34 2020) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On 9/20/20 3:25 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > From: Jonathan Cameron > > This code isn't used by any current mainline drivers (except > via error handling routes that shouldn't exist). The original > user is long gone. It is causing issues, so let's drop it. > > The main bulk of this mini-series is renaming the function to account > for the change in what it does. > > Lars, what impact does doing this have on your patches to mark hrtimer > and irq_work as expiring in hardirq context? I got a bit lost in the > discussion of that series, beyond figuring out his corner needed cleaning up. I think no impact. This is an issue that is orthogonal. I think the patches should still be applied as they are. For this series: Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen