From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C3DC43387 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94267206B7 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="da0gHnAe" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727107AbfAHK50 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2019 05:57:26 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f181.google.com ([209.85.167.181]:39057 "EHLO mail-oi1-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727782AbfAHK5Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2019 05:57:25 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f181.google.com with SMTP id i6so2951751oia.6 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 02:57:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xWpzVdg/e6UzVOjrd4RtIckInPRkRyaSSS21wxmlbwE=; b=da0gHnAe+uyOwsRktXvfE71bVxMFbgEknQBo2D2+GGapQ6j6CWkaA9mrLq/9UeWD5N 2817lc9ysrpAgHmY1vTrhVh5C125a4jSO0tPE/JdUcLLWYLzV4IFB3R1p45DLDlHdk/1 RbMVB1lmLbn0er0GvmSOinw6IQI3E6LGjvXPg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xWpzVdg/e6UzVOjrd4RtIckInPRkRyaSSS21wxmlbwE=; b=t3juV/Z4LcLzkLCa9MmhFFn1sAl7tD3RwtWvz7+3gBpbtA8IY0iVA9ilDzZRKsVfaF Q9NtJGUGTZxzSGqnDfyZvlLr1UL4+DBcbhJ0pQeLKBSSdUx0idkEdiuNbwqROurXqVo4 zFvY3TVYOuPeiwSya9ifWK8+Cvvqdg/INEyGJl/26bVAHYedwQloi1DnKitxKrdcpyJO H1fTsGaYcp2lngqwgvzC/qsQ6/WwrffQFEYq8AWKkD4VrfA8NCU9Q10FT09XccZ8xHWJ 0nsf7vZn3jqYpxrKJoEYB3CdCt/yUeHhHfhghJ6lUgyV25Phz+/dv7hkP/dpvENqqQh/ fsJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfDzGMtXEZG2c0ku6tsCoI93zSNXdkY6RV0uTVZvANbdQHDpD5+ Lmn/ZNhq/65RdxLa1c3MyMY8CagXTA4D5PBYWbTr3g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN785s8id1Mhe/zipIcUqyQef83MGcXhYd7OHCu7MT/49DFLViIwU3g2vSL/Z1k2XsLyvWZ9lDPZruQWGHRhtCc= X-Received: by 2002:aca:f103:: with SMTP id p3mr805419oih.94.1546945044745; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 02:57:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190108004632.GA3247@icarus> In-Reply-To: <20190108004632.GA3247@icarus> From: Benjamin Gaignard Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 11:57:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New IIO/counter driver To: William Breathitt Gray Cc: Patrick Havelange , Jonathan Cameron , Greg Kroah-Hartman , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Benjamin GAIGNARD , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Hartmut Knaack , Andrew Morton , Fabrice Gasnier , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Le mar. 8 janv. 2019 =C3=A0 01:46, William Breathitt Gray a =C3=A9crit : > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:45:37PM +0100, Patrick Havelange wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm in the process of adding a new IIO/counter driver, however I also s= aw > > that there was a work in progress to have a separate counter subsystem = ( > > https://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-iio&m=3D153974167727206 ). But it seems th= ere is > > no recent progress on it. > > What is the state of those patches ? Is it still interesting to develop= the > > driver as an IIO/counter , or should I use already that new subsystem ? > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Patrick Havelange. > > Hello, > > I am still open to merging this patchset and maintaining the Counter > subsystem. However, I took the lack of response for my latest > submission to indicate a loss of interest in this patchset's approach. > If there are still people who want this, I can rebase and resend this > patchset for submission; the past few versions have primarily been code > clarity and documentation changes so I believe the core design itself is > somewhat stable now. > > Just let me know how best to proceed and I shall be happy to oblige -- > whether to continue maintaining this patchset or to drop this design in > favor of improving the existing IIO Counter code in the kernel. > > I'll CC those from the patchset submission to keep them in the loop. I confirm that I still interested to get those patches merged. Regards, Benjamin > > Sincerely, > > William Breathitt Gray > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --=20 Benjamin Gaignard Graphic Study Group Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog