From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Ivan Mikhaylov <i.mikhaylov@yadro.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: proximity: Add driver support for vcnl3020 proximity sensor
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:10:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve4rejBKjG+mioRL3S7i3meyy=_4TtW1fr2aGvnVn2tBA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200323103926.21271-3-i.mikhaylov@yadro.com>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:41 PM Ivan Mikhaylov <i.mikhaylov@yadro.com> wrote:
>
> Proximity sensor driver based on light/vcnl4000.c code.
> For now supports only the single on-demand measurement.
>
> The VCNL3020 is a fully integrated proximity sensor. Fully
> integrated means that the infrared emitter is included in the
> package. It has 16-bit resolution. It includes a signal
> processing IC and features standard I2C communication
> interface. It features an interrupt function.
Thank you for a patch, my comments below.
> Datasheet available at:
> http://www.vishay.com/docs/84150/vcnl3020.pdf
I'm thinking that we may simple introduce new tag, called Datesheet:
to put such links.
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Mikhaylov <i.mikhaylov@yadro.com>
...
> obj-$(CONFIG_SRF08) += srf08.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SX9500) += sx9500.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VL53L0X_I2C) += vl53l0x-i2c.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VCNL3020) += vcnl3020.o
Perhaps keep ordered?
...
> +/*
> + * vcnl3020.c - Support for Vishay VCNL3020 proximity sensor
Using file names in themselves is a bad idea. Whenever you would
rename file (for instance, to support new sensors from the same family
in the future) you will forget (often, I see this in practice!) to
update this line.
Just drop it from here and try to avoid in the future.
> + *
> + * based on vcnl4000.c
This sounds like a continuation of previous sentence. Drop line in
between and use proper English grammar and punctuation.
> + */
...
> +struct vcnl3020_data {
> + struct i2c_client *client;
> + u32 rev;
> + struct mutex vcnl3020_lock; /* for i2c operations */
Simple 'lock' is enough, the rest is dup noise.
Also, consider kernel doc format instead of odd comments.
> +};
...
> +static const struct i2c_device_id vcnl3020_id[] = {
> + { "vcnl3020", 0 },
> + {}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, vcnl3020_id);
Can you group this with OF table below?
...
> +static int32_t vcnl3020_init(struct vcnl3020_data *data)
int32_t...
> +{
> + s32 rc;
...s32?!
Applies to entire code.
> + u32 led_current;
> + struct device *dev = &data->client->dev;
Reversed xmas tree order looks better.
> + rc = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, VCNL_PROD_REV);
Can you use regmap I²C API?
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Error (%d) reading product revision", rc);
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + if (rc == VCNL3020_PROD_ID) {
> + data->rev = rc & 0xff;
This conjunction looks strange. Also, why type of rev is u32 instead of u8?
> + mutex_init(&data->vcnl3020_lock);
> + } else {
> + dev_err(dev, "Product id (%x) did not match vcnl3020 (%x)", rc,
> + VCNL3020_PROD_ID);
> + rc = -ENODEV;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + /* set led current */
> + rc = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, VCNL_LED_CURRENT,
> + led_current);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Error (%d) setting LED current", rc);
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +exit:
> + return rc;
Useless. Return directly.
> +};
...
> + /* wait for data to become ready */
> + while (tries--) {
> + rc = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, VCNL_COMMAND);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + goto fail;
> + if (rc & VCNL_PS_RDY)
> + break;
> + msleep(20); /* measurement takes up to 100 ms */
> + }
Timeout loops look more naturally in do {} while format.
unsigned int tries = 5;
...
do {
...
} while (--tries);
...
> + *val = (rc & 0xff) << 8;
> + *val |= rc & 0xff;
All these conjunctions looks fishy. Why do you need them? Cant you
rely on the returned value by I²C API?
...
> +fail:
Better name is 'err_unlock' or 'out_unlock'. The rule of thumb to
describe in the label what you *about to do* there.
> + mutex_unlock(&data->vcnl3020_lock);
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
...
> + rc = vcnl3020_measure_proximity(data, val);
> + if (rc < 0)
Can rc be positive? Drop all these ' < 0' in cases where it is
guaranteed not to be the case.
> + return rc;
...
> +static int32_t vcnl3020_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
Can you switch to ->probe_new() ?
...
> + dev_info(&client->dev, "Proximity sensor, Rev: %02x\n",
> + data->rev);
Noise.
...
> + rc = devm_iio_device_register(&client->dev, indio_dev);
> + if (rc != 0)
Redundant ' != 0' part.
> + goto out;
> +
> + return rc;
> +out:
> + devm_iio_device_free(&client->dev, indio_dev);
> + return rc;
Managed resources are exactly for this not to be appeared in the code.
> +}
...
> +static const struct of_device_id vcnl3020_of_match[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "vishay,vcnl3020",
> + },
Missed terminator. How did you test this?
> +};
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-23 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-23 10:39 [PATCH 0/2] iio: proximity: driver for vcnl3020 Ivan Mikhaylov
2020-03-23 10:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] iio: proximity: provide device tree binding document Ivan Mikhaylov
2020-03-23 10:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: proximity: Add driver support for vcnl3020 proximity sensor Ivan Mikhaylov
2020-03-23 12:10 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-03-24 11:52 ` Ivan Mikhaylov
2020-03-24 12:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHp75Ve4rejBKjG+mioRL3S7i3meyy=_4TtW1fr2aGvnVn2tBA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=i.mikhaylov@yadro.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).