From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCADFC54FCB for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E28206ED for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="I/nqQv4P" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726157AbgDYSwj (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:52:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53246 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726145AbgDYSwi (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:52:38 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x644.google.com (mail-pl1-x644.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::644]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7B64C09B04D; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x644.google.com with SMTP id h11so5067723plr.11; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:52:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=e5aMK2w5+Vqp54D9P1CUzu4V0aJIFIn99GKnzqvS3pY=; b=I/nqQv4PsSCinTp2bGWPZKkw/qhM+PwatB+57nhF/lbed55Qg2wt0pD/QNJmUYIxiA leW3VMuvuYbLA7R0w0EZMW4raL6BvVARRQ3u0fOJ7nHG0GUkY0P8ugTM1i7GDU8SeAbk RETJKLJuRfEO2+gmLObJ43fA9/QKTppyx40ZE1JnuC0t7f7eO2/QLQddOAQtblS6C4+X G6l+LPfFRigHggyPgXrFLP671kHeawEPw4wXld/PEJ9XkXW8u/x3hXrA15y+PM0F/6hz sxuU0ArrKBaK27/5iI6cGRo4dCyb6XId42F8+1t3PNktvZ6erN3BShVBMrUQmhuJFUfY KR7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=e5aMK2w5+Vqp54D9P1CUzu4V0aJIFIn99GKnzqvS3pY=; b=RxthsJxq3vSURSGrY5kGWkBv+j1Y047sFRoTpjtZaepwkc8fhzSyoqdt1b1fZ9O6k/ 6IxfVzaFT6iv2jpAsQFVJs7mCHj++Gh8vcIceQDdvC1fqUGvmucHugrwjNSnRTQrpYUC g4MMXCAEicWVn9MZxLXafPKnrIMRrSTU2scnVKoKFpiJa92Edff9uHNKVCTOSIj+creC IRzYwio1AgpGwtUfnvtbJKl8A0NxdAYlTv8lAWxNtjHpBc5JJeHWlLN/S+QAlsJPW4Xb 4NcCnCejDNvI+GipHvYy3uWx1FhgeChZu+vcQ185wiLv6thjI/Klb10lUxi4Vuw4m4jZ BDag== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaDZub/rmv/texAAv6/T8vlLawL+MANi5NnHG5PNNXDPMMPK41/ 2D+sfk9I2azPfVwmr+wEDd3wVaaaByBIIvBPjzzR03qlm/A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJj1jonQSlBM68iDTHvO7nXzVE6SAE8XStQ5gZkbJB7NZXoA1Z82+2FBKmkUqxG4TtXnXibucMBWyCgXUCuSro= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2401:: with SMTP id h1mr14321206pje.1.1587840758078; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:52:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200422141135.86419-1-tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com> <20200422141135.86419-2-tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com> <20200424190413.GA2731@arch> <20200425184130.GA37271@arch> In-Reply-To: <20200425184130.GA37271@arch> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 21:52:25 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] iio: chemical: scd30: add core driver To: Tomasz Duszynski Cc: linux-iio , Linux Kernel Mailing List , devicetree , Rob Herring , Jonathan Cameron Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 9:42 PM Tomasz Duszynski wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 02:43:35PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:05 PM Tomasz Duszynski > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:49:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 5:22 PM Tomasz Duszynski > > > > wrote: ... > > > As for ABI that's in > > > a separate patch. > > > > It's not good from bisectability point of view. If by some reason this > > patch or documentation patch gets reverted, the other one will be > > dangling. > > Please, unify them. > > > > Huh? Reverting core and leaving leftovers would be wrong and pointless. Exactly my point why it should be one patch. To secure impossibility to do pointless reverts. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko