From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:36766 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726939AbeJEMHO (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2018 08:07:14 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ti_am335x_tsc: Enable wakeup capability From: Vignesh R To: Lee Jones CC: Dmitry Torokhov , Jonathan Cameron , , , , References: <20180630103318.25355-1-vigneshr@ti.com> <20180718074736.GA4641@dell> <20180718170902.vk7rahyoaevucxbi@penguin> <20180723053708.GA4213@dell> <2236aa96-ca56-fa30-157d-2f484c6968cc@ti.com> <20180725052621.GB5835@dell> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 10:41:02 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Friday 28 September 2018 11:42 AM, Vignesh R wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Wednesday 25 July 2018 10:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > [...] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Vignesh R (5): >>>>>>>> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't mark TSCADC MFD as wakeup capable >>>>>>>> Input: ti_am335x_tsc: Mark TSC device as wakeup source >>>>>>>> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Keep ADC interface on if child is wakeup >>>>>>>> capable >>>>>>>> iio: adc: ti_am335x_adc: Disable ADC during suspend unconditionally >>>>>>>> Input: ti_am335x_tsc: Mark IRQ as wakeup capable >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c | 12 ++++-------- >>>>>>>> drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- >>>>>>>> drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c | 14 +++++++++++++- >>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gentle ping... Could you review/pick this series? MFD amd IIO bits are >>>>>>> already ACKed >>>>>> >>>>>> MFD patches are reviewed "for my own reference" meaning that we >>>>>> haven't yet agreed on a merge plan yet. >>>>> >>>>> I think this series makes sense to be pushed through a single tree as >>>>> opposed to being spread between 3, even if it could technically be >>>>> possible. It looks like Jonathan is fine with going it through either >>>>> his or some other tree, I am fine with it going through MFD. >>>> >>>> I'm happy either way. >>>> >>> Thanks Dmitry, Jonathan and Lee Jones! >>> >>> Could this be applied to one of the trees now? MFD perhaps? >> >> It'll be applied, when it's applied. ;) > > I see that this series was not picked up for v4.19. Could you consider > this series for v4.20? Patches apply cleanly against linux-next. > > Gentle ping... -- Regards Vignesh