From: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com,
gwendal@chromium.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, syednwaris@gmail.com,
patrick.havelange@essensium.com, fabrice.gasnier@st.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] counter: Add character device interface
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:32:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9fe486c-7f4f-911a-7f40-f713ff0deb17@lechnology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201014190526.GA13439@shinobu>
On 10/14/20 2:05 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:43:08PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
>> On 9/26/20 9:18 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c b/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..2be3846e4105
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c
>>
>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * counter_push_event - queue event for userspace reading
>>> + * @counter: pointer to Counter structure
>>> + * @event: triggered event
>>> + * @channel: event channel
>>> + *
>>> + * Note: If no one is watching for the respective event, it is silently
>>> + * discarded.
>>> + *
>>> + * RETURNS:
>>> + * 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
>>> + */
>>> +int counter_push_event(struct counter_device *const counter, const u8 event,
>>> + const u8 channel)
>>> +{
>>> + struct counter_event ev = {0};
>>> + unsigned int copied = 0;
>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>> + struct counter_event_node *event_node;
>>> + struct counter_comp_node *comp_node;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + ev.timestamp = ktime_get_ns();
>>> + ev.watch.event = event;
>>> + ev.watch.channel = channel;
>>> +
>>> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&counter->events_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> + /* Search for event in the list */
>>> + list_for_each_entry(event_node, &counter->events_list, l)
>>> + if (event_node->event == event &&
>>> + event_node->channel == channel)
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + /* If event is not in the list */
>>> + if (&event_node->l == &counter->events_list)
>>> + goto exit_early;
>>> +
>>> + /* Read and queue relevant comp for userspace */
>>> + list_for_each_entry(comp_node, &event_node->comp_list, l) {
>>> + err = counter_get_data(counter, comp_node, &ev.value_u8);
>>
>> Currently all counter devices are memory mapped devices so calling
>> counter_get_data() here with interrupts disabled is probably OK, but
>> if any counter drivers are added that use I2C/SPI/etc. that will take
>> a long time to read, it would cause problems leaving interrupts
>> disabled here.
>>
>> Brainstorming: Would it make sense to separate the event from the
>> component value being read? As I mentioned in one of my previous
>> reviews, I think there are some cases where we would just want to
>> know when an event happened and not read any additional data anyway.
>> In the case of a slow communication bus, this would also let us
>> queue the event in the kfifo and notify poll right away and then
>> defer the reads in a workqueue for later.
>
> I don't see any problems with reporting just an event without any
> component value attached (e.g. userspace could handle the component
> reads via sysfs at a later point). We would just need a way to inform
> userspace that the struct counter_component in the struct counter_watch
> returned should be ignored.
>
> Perhaps we can add an additional member to struct counter_watch
> indicating whether it's an empty watch; or alternatively, add a new
> component scope define to differentiate between an actual component and
> an empty one (e.g. COUNTER_SCOPE_EVENT). What do you think?
>
> William Breathitt Gray
>
I made the same suggestion in one of my other replies - except
I called it COUNTER_SCOPE_NONE.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-14 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-27 2:18 [PATCH v5 0/5] Introduce the Counter character device interface William Breathitt Gray
2020-09-27 2:18 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] docs: counter: Update to reflect sysfs internalization William Breathitt Gray
2020-09-27 2:18 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] counter: Add character device interface William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-14 1:40 ` David Lechner
2020-10-18 16:49 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-20 15:53 ` David Lechner
2020-10-25 12:55 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-25 16:36 ` David Lechner
2020-10-14 17:43 ` David Lechner
2020-10-14 19:05 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-14 22:32 ` David Lechner [this message]
2020-10-14 22:40 ` David Lechner
2020-10-18 16:58 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-20 16:06 ` David Lechner
2020-10-25 13:18 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-25 16:34 ` David Lechner
2020-10-25 17:53 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-09-27 2:18 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] docs: counter: Document " William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-08 8:09 ` Pavel Machek
2020-10-08 12:28 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-12 17:04 ` David Lechner
2020-10-13 18:58 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-13 19:08 ` David Lechner
2020-10-13 19:27 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-09-27 2:18 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] counter: 104-quad-8: Add IRQ support for the ACCES 104-QUAD-8 William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-14 0:13 ` David Lechner
2020-10-18 14:50 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-13 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Introduce the Counter character device interface David Lechner
2020-10-18 14:14 ` William Breathitt Gray
[not found] ` <e38f6dc3a08bf2510034334262776a6ed1df8b89.1601170670.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
2020-10-13 2:15 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] counter: Internalize sysfs interface code David Lechner
2020-10-18 14:49 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-20 15:38 ` David Lechner
2020-10-23 13:12 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-10-15 1:38 ` David Lechner
2020-10-18 17:00 ` William Breathitt Gray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9fe486c-7f4f-911a-7f40-f713ff0deb17@lechnology.com \
--to=david@lechnology.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=fabrice.gasnier@st.com \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=patrick.havelange@essensium.com \
--cc=syednwaris@gmail.com \
--cc=vilhelm.gray@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).