Linux Input Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	Yu-Hsuan Hsu <yuhsuan@chromium.org>,
	Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] pwm: cros-ec: Accept more error codes from cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 09:21:30 +0200
Message-ID: <20200801072130.tmm7b4vtizshmmyo@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200726220101.29059-5-linux@roeck-us.net>


[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2737 bytes --]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 03:00:59PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Since commit c5cd2b47b203 ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: Report command
> not supported") we can no longer assume that cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status()
> reports -EPROTO for all errors returned by the EC itself. A follow-up
> patch will change cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() to report additional errors
> reported by the EC as distinguished Linux error codes.
> 
> Handle this change by no longer assuming that only -EPROTO is used
> to report all errors returned by the EC itself. Instead, support both
> the old and the new error codes.
> 
> Cc: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
> Cc: Yu-Hsuan Hsu <yuhsuan@chromium.org>
> Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
> Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> v3: Added patch
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
> index 09c08dee099e..ef05fba1bd37 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
> @@ -213,20 +213,27 @@ static int cros_ec_num_pwms(struct cros_ec_device *ec)
>  		u32 result = 0;
>  
>  		ret = __cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(ec, i, &result);
> -		/* We want to parse EC protocol errors */
> -		if (ret < 0 && !(ret == -EPROTO && result))
> -			return ret;
> -
>  		/*
>  		 * We look for SUCCESS, INVALID_COMMAND, or INVALID_PARAM
>  		 * responses; everything else is treated as an error.
>  		 */

This comment is at least misleading now.

> -		if (result == EC_RES_INVALID_COMMAND)
> +		switch (ret) {
> +		case -EOPNOTSUPP:	/* invalid command */
>  			return -ENODEV;

My first reaction here was to wonder why -EOPNOTSUPP isn't passed to the
upper layer. OK, this is a loop to test the number of available devices.

> -		else if (result == EC_RES_INVALID_PARAM)
> +		case -EINVAL:		/* invalid parameter */
>  			return i;
> -		else if (result)
> +		case -EPROTO:
> +			/* Old or new error return code: Handle both */
> +			if (result == EC_RES_INVALID_COMMAND)
> +				return -ENODEV;
> +			else if (result == EC_RES_INVALID_PARAM)
> +				return i;

If I understand correctly this surprising calling convention (output
parameter is filled even though the function returned an error) is the
old one that is to be fixed.

>  			return -EPROTO;
> +		default:
> +			if (ret < 0)
> +				return ret;
> +			break;
> +		}
>  	}
>  

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-26 22:00 [PATCH v3 0/6] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: Convert EC error codes to Linux error codes Guenter Roeck
2020-07-26 22:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] iio: cros_ec: Accept -EOPNOTSUPP as 'not supported' error code Guenter Roeck
2020-07-26 22:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] cros_ec_lightbar: Accept more error codes from cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status Guenter Roeck
2020-07-26 22:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] platform/chrome: cros_ec_sysfs: Report range of error codes from EC Guenter Roeck
2020-07-26 22:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] pwm: cros-ec: Accept more error codes from cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status Guenter Roeck
2020-07-27  8:35   ` Thierry Reding
2020-08-01  7:21   ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2020-08-01 16:32     ` Guenter Roeck
2020-08-02 20:27       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-26 22:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] platform/input: cros_ec: Replace -ENOTSUPP with -ENOPROTOOPT Guenter Roeck
2020-07-30  4:53   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-07-26 22:01 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: Convert EC error codes to Linux error codes Guenter Roeck
2020-07-29 22:21   ` Brian Norris
2020-07-29 23:22     ` Guenter Roeck
2020-07-29 23:29       ` Brian Norris
2020-07-29 22:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] " Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200801072130.tmm7b4vtizshmmyo@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
    --cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=pmalani@chromium.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=yuhsuan@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux Input Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/0 linux-input/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-input linux-input/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input \
		linux-input@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-input

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-input


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git