Hey Greg, On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 03:58:17PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:47:24PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > The driver core ignores the return value of struct device_driver::remove > > because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to > > make this function return void, let struct sa1111_driver::remove return > > void, too. All users already unconditionally return 0, this commit makes > > it obvious that returning an error code is a bad idea and ensures future > > users behave accordingly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König > > Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Thanks, can I interpret this also as an Ack to take the change affecting drivers/usb via Russell's tree? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |