Re: [PATCH v4 01/48] Input: introduce input_mt_report_slot_inactive

[Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@bitmath.org>]

Hi Dmitry,

On 2019-10-31 00:23, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 06:13:09PM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> Hi Jiada,
>>
>>> input_mt_report_slot_state() ignores the tool when the slot is closed.
>>> which has caused a bit of confusion.
>>> This patch introduces input_mt_report_slot_inactive() to report slot
>>> inactive state.
>>> replaces all input_mt_report_slot_state() with
>>> input_mt_report_slot_inactive() in case of close of slot.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
>> NACK on this one.
>>
>> We already discussed this patch and the potentially changed behavior to
>> existing setups stemming from ignoring the MT state.
>>
>> On the upside, what I can see this patch does exactly no difference to the
>> cases where the MT state is set, so it can be safely dropped without
>> affecting the rest of the patch series.
> I guess Jiada's concern that we are forcing to pass tool type even
> though we end up ignoring it intervally, which confuses users of the API
> as they might not know what tool to specify.
>
> How about we do:
>
> static inline void input_mt_report_slot_inactive(struct input_dev *dev)
> {
> 	input_mt_report_slot_state(dev, 0, false);
> }
>
> This should not change any behavior.

Agreed, that will work.

Thanks,

Henrik