linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Duggan <aduggan@synaptics.com>
To: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@163.com>,
	Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nick Dyer <nick@shmanahar.org>,
	Christopher Heiny <Cheiny@synaptics.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - Avoid processing unknown IRQs
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 21:46:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6e517a2-51ca-431a-88f8-8bfa0a867dc6@synaptics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191008223657.163366-1-evgreen@chromium.org>

Hi Evan,

On 10/8/19 3:36 PM, Evan Green wrote:
> rmi_process_interrupt_requests() calls handle_nested_irq() for
> each interrupt status bit it finds. If the irq domain mapping for
> this bit had not yet been set up, then it ends up calling
> handle_nested_irq(0), which causes a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> There's already code that masks the irq_status bits coming out of the
> hardware with current_irq_mask, presumably to avoid this situation.
> However current_irq_mask seems to more reflect the actual mask set
> in the hardware rather than the IRQs software has set up and registered
> for. For example, in rmi_driver_reset_handler(), the current_irq_mask
> is initialized based on what is read from the hardware. If the reset
> value of this mask enables IRQs that Linux has not set up yet, then
> we end up in this situation.
>
> There appears to be a third unused bitmask that used to serve this
> purpose, fn_irq_bits. Use that bitmask instead of current_irq_mask
> to avoid calling handle_nested_irq() on IRQs that have not yet been
> set up.

Yes, it looks like the code which ensured that there was a function 
handler to handle the IRQ was removed when the driver switched to using 
an irq domain. Setting the fn_irq_bits and using them instead of 
current_irq_mask in rmi_process_interrupt_requests() makes sense to me.

Andrew

> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Duggan <aduggan@synaptics.com>
> ---
>
>   drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c | 6 +++++-
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
> index 772493b1f665..190b9974526b 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int rmi_process_interrupt_requests(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev)
>   	}
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&data->irq_mutex);
> -	bitmap_and(data->irq_status, data->irq_status, data->current_irq_mask,
> +	bitmap_and(data->irq_status, data->irq_status, data->fn_irq_bits,
>   	       data->irq_count);
>   	/*
>   	 * At this point, irq_status has all bits that are set in the
> @@ -385,6 +385,8 @@ static int rmi_driver_set_irq_bits(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev,
>   	bitmap_copy(data->current_irq_mask, data->new_irq_mask,
>   		    data->num_of_irq_regs);
>   
> +	bitmap_or(data->fn_irq_bits, data->fn_irq_bits, mask, data->irq_count);
> +
>   error_unlock:
>   	mutex_unlock(&data->irq_mutex);
>   	return error;
> @@ -398,6 +400,8 @@ static int rmi_driver_clear_irq_bits(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev,
>   	struct device *dev = &rmi_dev->dev;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&data->irq_mutex);
> +	bitmap_andnot(data->fn_irq_bits,
> +		      data->fn_irq_bits, mask, data->irq_count);
>   	bitmap_andnot(data->new_irq_mask,
>   		  data->current_irq_mask, mask, data->irq_count);
>   

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-11 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-08 22:36 [PATCH] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - Avoid processing unknown IRQs Evan Green
2019-10-08 22:36 ` Evan Green
2019-10-11 21:46 ` Andrew Duggan [this message]
2019-10-11 21:46   ` Andrew Duggan
2019-10-17 18:04   ` Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a6e517a2-51ca-431a-88f8-8bfa0a867dc6@synaptics.com \
    --to=aduggan@synaptics.com \
    --cc=Cheiny@synaptics.com \
    --cc=allison@lohutok.net \
    --cc=bianpan2016@163.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nick@shmanahar.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).