Linux Input Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: goodix - Fix compilation when ACPI support is disabled
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:02:58 +0100
Message-ID: <be555dbf9c8508c5b8d9ed561384c66d76326241.camel@hadess.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5aca9fe9-3751-f0f6-9851-5d9a0c048388@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 14:55 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> We could do something like that, but TBH I'm not a fan of that
> 
> adding extra wrappers makes it harder to see what the code is
> 
> actually doing.
> 
> 
> 
> I understand your dislike for the extra braces I added and
> 
> I'm fine with fixing that by adding __maybe_unused to the
> 
> variable declarations at the top. I don't really see what
> 
> the problem with the #ifdef-s is given how clean they are,
> 
> with the braces thing fixed by using __maybe_unused things
> 
> would look like e.g. this:

It's not only the fact that there's extra #ifdef's, it's that the
ifdef's need to be just "that". It's not "#ifdef FOO", it's "#if
defined CONFIG_X86 && defined CONFIG_ACPI".

I'd really prefer a separate function(s) that would be the only
place(s) where the conditions would be, and with one-liner bodies, to
work-around the fact that those ACPI calls are only really half-
stubbed.


  reply index

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-25 10:33 Hans de Goede
2020-03-25 10:47 ` Bastien Nocera
2020-03-25 11:49   ` Hans de Goede
2020-03-25 12:11     ` Bastien Nocera
2020-03-25 13:55       ` Hans de Goede
2020-03-25 14:02         ` Bastien Nocera [this message]
2020-03-25 14:05           ` Hans de Goede
2020-03-25 14:10             ` Bastien Nocera
2020-03-25 14:55               ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=be555dbf9c8508c5b8d9ed561384c66d76326241.camel@hadess.net \
    --to=hadess@hadess.net \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux Input Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/0 linux-input/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-input linux-input/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input \
		linux-input@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-input

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-input


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git