From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C2EC169C4 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 21:46:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEED20869 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 21:46:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728737AbfAaVqf (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:46:35 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:54732 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726233AbfAaVqe (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:46:34 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x0VLZcNu118421 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:46:33 -0500 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qc8xh0rwr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:46:33 -0500 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 21:46:31 -0000 Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.24) by e11.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.198) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 31 Jan 2019 21:46:28 -0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x0VLkRwh18546698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 21:46:27 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94335B2064; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 21:46:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1347FB205F; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 21:46:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from swastik.ibm.com (unknown [9.85.222.107]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 21:46:26 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: device tree "compatible" string value for Nuvoton TPM 75xxx From: Nayna To: oshri.alkoby@nuvoton.com, Dan.Morav@nuvoton.com, jgg@ziepe.ca Cc: dana.cohen@nuvoton.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, gcwilson@us.ibm.com References: <63ed4dcb-a8ae-09ad-6793-8b1bb671d652@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <42e1f00b059f464e9d906cece191ed0a@NTILML02.nuvoton.com> <20190121022640.GD18017@ziepe.ca> <3e423306bfd14125a18f81f6b7bac136@NTILML02.nuvoton.com> <60e23fd0f0ff4d1f8954034237ae8865@NTILML02.nuvoton.com> <16c939bd-0b32-71cf-094e-ae3cc0546ad6@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:46:26 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <16c939bd-0b32-71cf-094e-ae3cc0546ad6@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19013121-2213-0000-0000-000003487135 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010511; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000277; SDB=6.01154516; UDB=6.00602035; IPR=6.00934948; MB=3.00025380; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-01-31 21:46:30 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19013121-2214-0000-0000-00005D2FE1F4 Message-Id: <08f7532a-b5cd-df2d-c8f9-b363a713882b@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-31_12:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=625 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901310157 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On 01/23/2019 03:22 PM, Nayna wrote: > > > On 01/21/2019 11:55 AM, oshri.alkoby@nuvoton.com wrote: >> Hi Jason, >> >> Since the driver implements the I2C interface defined by the TCG PTP, >> wouldn't it be better to set the string to be something like >> 'tcg,tpm-i2c-ptp' (as 'tcg,tpm-tis-mmio' for tpm-tis)? >> Any TPM that implements this protocol can use this driver. > > It might be nice to have a generic name if it is also compliant with > the device tree specification. > However, I was wondering if it will not require driver code changes as > well before this generic name can be used by any TPM implementing i2c > protocol ? I am wondering if anything got decided on this ? Thanks & Regards,        - Nayna