From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Michael Niewöhner" <linux@mniewoehner.de>,
"Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nayna Jain" <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
"Ken Goldman" <kgold@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: tpm_tis TPM2.0 not detected on cold boot
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 16:17:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1546291059.4069.158.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <912668ea1d74f526f78f03f562fdaf17fc06f62c.camel@mniewoehner.de>
On Sun, 2018-12-30 at 14:22 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > difference is that on a cold boot, the TPM takes longer to initialize.
>
> Well, as I said. Waiting for 10, 20 or even 60 seconds in the boot manager does
> not solve the problem. So the problem is NOT that the TPM takes longer to
> initialize. Even adding a delay of 20 seconds before TPM init does not solve
> that while that should be more than enough time.
The purpose of commenting out the TPM2 selftest was to minimize the
TPM initialization delay, so that the TPM is ready before IMA. After
James' patch that wasn't needed anymore.
Looking back at this thread, I see you're using systemd-boot, not
grub2. When you commented out the systemd-boot timeout, IMA found the
TPM. The question is why isn't the TPM ready with the timeout before
IMA (like above)? Has systemd-boot done the selftest?
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-31 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-16 13:32 tpm_tis TPM2.0 not detected on cold boot Michael Niewöhner
2018-12-22 13:47 ` Michael Niewöhner
2018-12-22 22:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-12-23 11:55 ` Michael Niewöhner
2018-12-25 13:55 ` Michael Niewöhner
2018-12-30 3:33 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-12-30 13:22 ` Michael Niewöhner
2018-12-31 18:10 ` Ken Goldman
2018-12-31 21:17 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2019-01-01 16:15 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-01 16:38 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-01-01 16:47 ` Michael Niewöhner
2018-12-31 17:56 ` Ken Goldman
2019-01-03 13:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-03 13:38 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-03 15:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-03 15:47 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-04 11:58 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-04 15:28 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-04 18:26 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-10 17:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-10 18:03 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-10 17:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-10 18:00 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-03 13:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-03 13:55 ` Michael Niewöhner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1546291059.4069.158.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kgold@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@mniewoehner.de \
--cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).