From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24A5C43381 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7EB2173C for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726539AbfBZMOz (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:14:55 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:54188 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725935AbfBZMOz (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:14:55 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1QC9LU5038303 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:14:53 -0500 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qw4114q61-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:14:53 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:14:52 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:14:50 -0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x1QCEndW31129818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:14:49 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6434C04E; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:14:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1E24C040; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:14:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.108.64]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:14:48 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: IMA fails to see TPM chip (rpi3, linaro optee) From: Mimi Zohar To: Markku Savela , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Peter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=FCwe?= Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:14:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <357e44f8-df31-48ec-d2f0-deabd0161fc0@moth.iki.fi> References: <9cd0d399-2b11-779c-f767-660ea61721d9@moth.iki.fi> <192719a8-d583-b7cd-07d2-b693e2cc982d@moth.iki.fi> <1651d634-9a88-4511-ac51-a69648db8259@moth.iki.fi> <1550753358.17768.85.camel@linux.ibm.com> <776f0386-6c4d-9ad4-929c-44ba9fd4c9d0@moth.iki.fi> <88215b47-976c-96d5-1098-40868d28d576@moth.iki.fi> <357e44f8-df31-48ec-d2f0-deabd0161fc0@moth.iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19022612-0020-0000-0000-0000031B6997 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19022612-0021-0000-0000-0000216CCF51 Message-Id: <1551183277.27819.66.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-02-26_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902260091 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 10:12 +0200, Markku Savela wrote: > In case anyone is interested, I got IMA to accept TPM chip in my special > case (linaro optee kernel) by changing > > clk-bcm2835.c: core_initcall -> susbsys_initcall > raspberrypi.c: subsys_initcall -> core_initcall > > At first check, the system seems to be ok. Maybe some combination of > initcalls could work, but this is enough for me. Thank you for sharing this! Mimi > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c > index d6caac9c3..7cdd597f1 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c > @@ -2330,7 +2330,7 @@ static int __init __bcm2835_clk_driver_init(void) > { > return platform_driver_register(&bcm2835_clk_driver); > } > -core_initcall(__bcm2835_clk_driver_init); > +subsys_initcall(__bcm2835_clk_driver_init); > > MODULE_AUTHOR("Eric Anholt "); > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("BCM2835 clock driver"); > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c b/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c > index a82819a78..dfa362e1c 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c > @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static int __init rpi_firmware_init(void) > out1: > return ret; > } > -subsys_initcall(rpi_firmware_init); > +core_initcall(rpi_firmware_init); > > static void __init rpi_firmware_exit(void) > {