From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B136C04AAF for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 00:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9512206BF for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 00:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727175AbfEQAal (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 20:30:41 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:40924 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726738AbfEQAal (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 20:30:41 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4H0RH4t025772 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 20:30:40 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2shhtc9a7e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 20:30:39 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:30:37 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 17 May 2019 01:30:33 +0100 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x4H0UWJM43974822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 17 May 2019 00:30:32 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9AEA4062; Fri, 17 May 2019 00:30:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCA5A4065; Fri, 17 May 2019 00:30:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.80.98]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 May 2019 00:30:31 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ima: don't ignore INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN EVM status From: Mimi Zohar To: Sasha Levin , Roberto Sassu , dmitry.kasatkin@huawei.com Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 20:30:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190517001001.9BEF620848@mail.kernel.org> References: <20190516161257.6640-3-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> <20190517001001.9BEF620848@mail.kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19051700-0008-0000-0000-000002E786DE X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19051700-0009-0000-0000-000022542EB9 Message-Id: <1558053020.4507.32.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-05-16_19:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=908 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905170002 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-05-17 at 00:10 +0000, Sasha Levin wrote: > > How should we proceed with this patch? Yikes!  This was posted earlier today.  I haven't even had a chance to look at it yet.  Similarly for "[PATCH 4/4] ima: only audit failed appraisal verifications". Mimi