From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDC5C04AB4 for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0186820656 for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728315AbfEQLAl (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 May 2019 07:00:41 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:43378 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727689AbfEQLAl (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 May 2019 07:00:41 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4HAvMDK117876 for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 07:00:40 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2sht7eku1w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 07:00:39 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 17 May 2019 12:00:38 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 17 May 2019 12:00:35 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x4HB0Z6e42663944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 17 May 2019 11:00:35 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E424642063; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:00:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D178A42052; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:00:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.80.67]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:00:33 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] LTP reproducer on broken IMA on overlayfs From: Mimi Zohar To: Petr Vorel Cc: Ignaz Forster , Fabian Vogt , Marcus Meissner , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 07:00:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190517075057.GA12489@dell5510> References: <20190405165225.27216-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20190514121213.GA28655@dell5510> <1557889279.4581.14.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20190515120853.GA22992@dell5510> <1558044649.4507.10.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20190517075057.GA12489@dell5510> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19051711-0008-0000-0000-000002E7AEE3 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19051711-0009-0000-0000-0000225458BE Message-Id: <1558090823.4507.50.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-05-17_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=687 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905170073 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-05-17 at 09:50 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: > > If it's ok for you and it's a valid test do you give an ack? Of course! Thanks! Mimi