From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0D3C388F3 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEDC21850 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727988AbfI0O1G (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:27:06 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:54372 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727980AbfI0O1G (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:27:06 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8REMB49107203 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:27:04 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2v9m2ur9j9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:27:04 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:27:02 +0100 Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.192) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:26:56 +0100 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8REQRxh24510836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:26:27 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68A0A405B; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:26:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3806A405C; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:26:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from swastik.ibm.com (unknown [9.80.207.173]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:26:50 +0000 (GMT) From: Nayna Jain To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Ard Biesheuvel , Jeremy Kerr , Matthew Garret , Mimi Zohar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Claudio Carvalho , George Wilson , Elaine Palmer , Eric Ricther , "Oliver O'Halloran" , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Nayna Jain Subject: [PATCH v6 6/9] ima: make process_buffer_measurement() non static Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:25:57 -0400 X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1569594360-7141-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> References: <1569594360-7141-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19092714-0016-0000-0000-000002B156C5 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19092714-0017-0000-0000-000033122993 Message-Id: <1569594360-7141-7-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-09-27_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909270134 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org To add the support for checking against blacklist, it would be needed to add an additional measurement record that identifies the record as blacklisted. This patch modifies the process_buffer_measurement() and makes it non static to be used by blacklist functionality. It modifies the function to handle more than just the KEXEC_CMDLINE. Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 3 +++ security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------------- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index 19769bf5f6ab..9bf509217e8e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, int xattr_len, const struct modsig *modsig, int pcr, struct ima_template_desc *template_desc); +void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size, + const char *eventname, int pcr, + struct ima_template_desc *template_desc); void ima_audit_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, const unsigned char *filename); int ima_alloc_init_template(struct ima_event_data *event_data, diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index 79c01516211b..ae0c1bdc4eaf 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -626,14 +626,14 @@ int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id) * @buf: pointer to the buffer that needs to be added to the log. * @size: size of buffer(in bytes). * @eventname: event name to be used for the buffer entry. - * @cred: a pointer to a credentials structure for user validation. - * @secid: the secid of the task to be validated. + * @pcr: pcr to extend the measurement + * @template_desc: template description * * Based on policy, the buffer is measured into the ima log. */ -static void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size, - const char *eventname, - const struct cred *cred, u32 secid) +void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size, + const char *eventname, int pcr, + struct ima_template_desc *template_desc) { int ret = 0; struct ima_template_entry *entry = NULL; @@ -642,19 +642,11 @@ static void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size, .filename = eventname, .buf = buf, .buf_len = size}; - struct ima_template_desc *template_desc = NULL; struct { struct ima_digest_data hdr; char digest[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE]; } hash = {}; int violation = 0; - int pcr = CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX; - int action = 0; - - action = ima_get_action(NULL, cred, secid, 0, KEXEC_CMDLINE, &pcr, - &template_desc); - if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE)) - return; iint.ima_hash = &hash.hdr; iint.ima_hash->algo = ima_hash_algo; @@ -686,12 +678,19 @@ static void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size, */ void ima_kexec_cmdline(const void *buf, int size) { + int pcr = CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX; + struct ima_template_desc *template_desc = NULL; + int action; u32 secid; if (buf && size != 0) { security_task_getsecid(current, &secid); - process_buffer_measurement(buf, size, "kexec-cmdline", - current_cred(), secid); + action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), secid, 0, + KEXEC_CMDLINE, &pcr, &template_desc); + if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE)) + return; + process_buffer_measurement(buf, size, "kexec-cmdline", pcr, + template_desc); } } -- 2.20.1