From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, "open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>, "open list:CRYPTO API" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: asym_tpm: Switch to get_random_bytes() Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 09:02:32 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1570107752.4421.183.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20191003114119.GF8933@linux.intel.com> On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 14:41 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 10:00:19AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 20:16 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > Only the kernel random pool should be used for generating random numbers. > > > TPM contributes to that pool among the other sources of entropy. In here it > > > is not, agreed, absolutely critical because TPM is what is trusted anyway > > > but in order to remove tpm_get_random() we need to first remove all the > > > call sites. > > > > At what point during boot is the kernel random pool available? Does > > this imply that you're planning on changing trusted keys as well? > > Well trusted keys *must* be changed to use it. It is not a choice > because using a proprietary random number generator instead of defacto > one in the kernel can be categorized as a *regression*. I really don't see how using the TPM random number for TPM trusted keys would be considered a regression. That by definition is a trusted key. If anything, changing what is currently being done would be the regression. > Also, TEE trusted keys cannot use the TPM option. That isn't a valid justification for changing the original definition of trusted keys. Just as the kernel supports different methods of implementing the same function on different architectures, trusted keys will need to support different methods of generating a random number. > > If it was not initialized early enough we would need fix that too. Shouldn't this be determined and fixed, before making any changes? > > I don't think there should be a problem anyway since encrypted keys is > already using get_random_bytes(). Encrypted keys has no bearing on trusted keys. Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-03 13:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-09-26 17:16 Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-09-28 18:05 ` Jerry Snitselaar 2019-10-01 20:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-02 14:00 ` Mimi Zohar 2019-10-03 11:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-03 11:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-03 13:02 ` Mimi Zohar [this message] 2019-10-03 17:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-03 18:53 ` Mimi Zohar 2019-10-03 21:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-03 21:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-03 22:08 ` Mimi Zohar 2019-10-03 23:59 ` James Bottomley 2019-10-04 18:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-04 18:24 ` James Bottomley 2019-10-04 18:33 ` Jerry Snitselaar 2019-10-04 18:42 ` James Bottomley 2019-10-04 20:07 ` Jerry Snitselaar 2019-10-04 20:11 ` Jerry Snitselaar 2019-10-04 22:11 ` James Bottomley 2019-10-06 0:38 ` Mimi Zohar 2019-10-06 23:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-07 18:08 ` Mimi Zohar 2019-10-04 18:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-03 22:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-04 13:26 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US) 2019-10-04 18:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-04 18:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-04 19:56 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US) 2019-10-07 0:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-07 22:13 ` Ken Goldman 2019-10-08 23:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-08 23:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-09 7:10 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen 2019-10-09 7:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-09 7:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-09 8:09 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen 2019-10-14 19:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-09 8:02 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen 2019-10-09 12:11 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US) 2019-10-14 19:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-14 19:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-14 19:29 ` James Bottomley 2019-10-16 11:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-16 12:34 ` James Bottomley 2019-10-16 16:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-16 19:10 ` James Bottomley 2019-10-17 12:52 ` Sumit Garg 2019-10-17 12:58 ` James Bottomley 2019-10-17 18:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-21 11:39 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-29 8:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-29 14:58 ` James Bottomley 2019-10-31 21:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-18 7:32 ` Janne Karhunen 2019-10-03 18:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-03 18:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-10-07 10:33 ` Janne Karhunen
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1570107752.4421.183.camel@linux.ibm.com \ --to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \ --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \ --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] KEYS: asym_tpm: Switch to get_random_bytes()' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).