linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: James Morris <jamorris@linuxonhyperv.com>
Subject: Re: IMA: Data included in the key measurement
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:32:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1574451150.11063.3.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19554a75-06c3-f234-f27e-25f65dbecd1f@linux.microsoft.com>

On Fri, 2019-11-22 at 09:39 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On 11/22/19 8:17 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the info James. I'll investigate further.

It strikes me that for attestation purposes, the hash of the
TBSCertificate, which is the thing that the issuer signs so we have it
anyway (well modulo us wanting a different hash algorithm), is a
complete and unique identifier for the certificate; can't we just use
that ... and perhaps we should add it to the ids stored in the key
payload[2]?

James


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-22 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-21 16:17 IMA: Data included in the key measurement Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-11-21 16:38 ` James Bottomley
2019-11-22  1:15   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-11-22 16:17     ` James Bottomley
2019-11-22 17:39       ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-11-22 19:32         ` James Bottomley [this message]
2019-11-25 17:33       ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-11-25 18:14         ` Mimi Zohar
2019-11-25 18:19           ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-11-22 17:38 ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1574451150.11063.3.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jamorris@linuxonhyperv.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).