From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90756C2D0DB for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D16D24655 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729019AbgAVMXP (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:23:15 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:19410 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728912AbgAVMXO (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:23:14 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00MCMWfk062243 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:23:13 -0500 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xp95fecwn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:23:13 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:23:12 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:23:09 -0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 00MCN8YR20512960 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:23:08 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B925FAE053; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:23:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B48CAE04D; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:23:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.146.245]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:23:07 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] IMA: Turn IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS off by default From: Mimi Zohar To: James Bottomley , Lakshmi Ramasubramanian , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: sashal@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:23:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1579636351.3390.35.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <20200121171302.4935-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> <1579628090.3390.28.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1579634035.5125.311.camel@linux.ibm.com> <1579636351.3390.35.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20012212-4275-0000-0000-00000399E783 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20012212-4276-0000-0000-000038ADF27D Message-Id: <1579695787.5182.29.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-17_05:2020-01-16,2020-01-17 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-2001220114 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2020-01-21 at 11:52 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2020-01-21 at 14:13 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > This change permits disabling queueing certificates. Whether the > > default should be "disabled" is a separate question. I'm open to > > comments/suggestions. > > I'm just giving the general rule of thumb for boolean config options. > If it's default Y there likely shouldn't be a config option and if it's > default N the feature should likely not be in the kernel at all. Thanks, James.  I'll keep this in mind when debating about defining a new Kconfig option. Mimi