From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842DCC11D3D for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A21024699 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="xadA/kGf"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="IVilGe3o" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729303AbgB0U0q (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:26:46 -0500 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:52328 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726758AbgB0U0q (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:26:46 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E768EE181; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:26:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1582835206; bh=KJhb2aBt46LQRY+Zk9XgRVZeXd292dtIMZvrc7nL19o=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xadA/kGfQKrzw54ZxEBIAd2CQSK6tlHRgRRo65kKOj5RzqvPyvalpoh0T4alX3K2Q cwT5tnV+DIczDqGQrjjSRU8a/lshWjS10bynpCR+IA4WVt1cs7aiN9p2pXUfDgxdww qHR5zAKVdBPcwdRPknCNgWOxpcFyg5hwSoE7r6xw= Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iJH3XlpfdfYm; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:26:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from jarvis.ext.hansenpartnership.com (jarvis.ext.hansenpartnership.com [153.66.160.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 529138EE079; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:26:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1582835205; bh=KJhb2aBt46LQRY+Zk9XgRVZeXd292dtIMZvrc7nL19o=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IVilGe3okhO7Mq1UWo5dh4FTYKv5DzLdN4TPPxp/cdPKjm5Q57Rr4Ssld+3qRvg/6 BvoIeMTnueU4Cnt+YJ2HXuyNKaazE81UPozMuohWciWk54ant2zcGKozHXixVumNrO ioNRB8SW4svtbzdUl4htfO+wTgaRp6TxVD28HPBA= Message-ID: <1582835204.18538.21.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] security: keys: trusted: use ASN.1 TPM2 key format for the blobs From: James Bottomley To: James Prestwood , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mimi Zohar , Jarkko Sakkinen , David Woodhouse , keyrings@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:26:44 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1582834760.18538.15.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <20200130101812.6271-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> <20200130101812.6271-5-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> <5c593b6f23ae41e90e6b3799141ea68944bb4034.camel@gmail.com> <1582761736.4245.12.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1582764844.4245.29.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <17e025e222cb6aefb5680d6cdad64a9ecf76fa97.camel@gmail.com> <1582834760.18538.15.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 12:19 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 09:19 -0800, James Prestwood wrote: [...] > > I think this was all a result of bad packaging on Fedora's part, > > but still, the experience didn't sit well with me and I felt it > > would be worth while to add support for this in keyctl. > > Well there's a list you can report problems to and get help: > > openssl-tpm2-engine@groups.io > > I've got to confess I develop on openSUSE and debian, so Fedora > doesn't get much testing. I should add that even though I don't test on fedora, the opensuse build service does in my TPM build environment: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:jejb1:TPM/openssl_tpm2_engine It says the builds for Fedora 26, 29 and Rawhide all succeeded. The build service does both building and testing with the swtpm, so the engine on fedora gets a pretty extensive workout. James