From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>,
Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 07:02:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1595156526.27397.67.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200717192447.GO3673@sequoia>
On Fri, 2020-07-17 at 14:24 -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 2020-07-17 15:20:22, Nayna wrote:
> >
> > On 7/9/20 2:19 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> > > Ask the LSM to free its audit rule rather than directly calling kfree().
> >
> > Is it to be called audit rule or filter rule ? Likewise in subject line.
> gt
> The security hooks call this "audit rule" but Mimi explained the
> reasoning for IMA referring to this as an "audit filter" here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1593466203.5085.62.camel@linux.ibm.com/
>
> I would be fine with her renaming/rewording this patch, accordingly, in
> next-integrity-testing.
Both here and "ima: AppArmor satisfies the audit rule requirements",
the subject is AppArmor/LSM, which do refer to the rules as "audit"
rules. In the "ima: Rename internal audit rule functions" case, the
rule rename is internal to IMA. Here it makes sense to replace
"audit" with "filter". Tyler, I've gone ahead and made the change.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-19 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-09 6:18 [PATCH v3 00/12] ima: Fix rule parsing bugs and extend KEXEC_CMDLINE rule support Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule Tyler Hicks
2020-07-17 19:20 ` Nayna
2020-07-17 19:24 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-19 11:02 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-07-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] ima: Free the entire rule when deleting a list of rules Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] ima: Free the entire rule if it fails to parse Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when buffer hook functions have an invalid action Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when the KEXEC_CMDLINE hook is combined with an invalid cond Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when the KEY_CHECK " Tyler Hicks
2020-07-17 18:56 ` Nayna
2020-07-17 19:18 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-17 23:39 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when appraise_flag=blacklist is unsupportable Tyler Hicks
2020-07-16 18:14 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-07-16 18:20 ` Tyler Hicks
[not found] ` <76d2b27b-3b59-1852-046a-b1718c62b167@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-07-17 18:11 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-20 17:02 ` Nayna
2020-07-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ima: Shallow copy the args_p member of ima_rule_entry.lsm elements Tyler Hicks
2020-07-17 15:35 ` Konsta Karsisto
2020-07-17 16:51 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ima: Use correct type for " Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ima: Move comprehensive rule validation checks out of the token parser Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ima: Use the common function to detect LSM conditionals in a rule Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ima: Support additional conditionals in the KEXEC_CMDLINE hook function Tyler Hicks
2020-07-17 4:31 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] ima: Fix rule parsing bugs and extend KEXEC_CMDLINE rule support Mimi Zohar
2020-07-17 4:34 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-20 21:38 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1595156526.27397.67.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=janne.karhunen@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=prsriva02@gmail.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).