linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, tweek@google.com,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm/eventlog/tpm1: Simplify walking over *pos measurements
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:09:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190116220952.GH25803@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1547197173-52826-2-git-send-email-zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>

Please use "tpm:" tag for commits, not "tpm/eventlog/tpm1".

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 04:59:32PM +0800, Jia Zhang wrote:
> The responsibility of tpm1_bios_measurements_start() is to walk
> over the first *pos measurements, ensuring the skipped and
> to-be-read measurements are not out-of-boundary.
> 
> Current logic is complicated a bit. Just employ a do-while loop
> with necessary sanity check, and then get the goal.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>

What does this fix? Even if the current logic is "complicated", it is
still a pretty simple functiion.

Applying clean ups for fun has the side-effect of making backporting
more difficult. And swapping implementation randomly has the side-effect
of potentially introducing regressions. The current code might be messy
but it is still field tested.

I'm sorry but I have to reject this patch.

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-16 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-11  8:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] tpm/eventlog/tpm1: Small fixes Jia Zhang
2019-01-11  8:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] tpm/eventlog/tpm1: Simplify walking over *pos measurements Jia Zhang
2019-01-16 22:09   ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-01-17  1:32     ` Jia Zhang
2019-01-18 15:18       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-19  7:48         ` Jia Zhang
2019-01-11  8:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] tpm/eventlog/tpm1: Fix off-by-1 when reading binary_bios_measurements Jia Zhang
2019-01-16 22:17   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-06  7:23 [PATCH 1/2] tpm/eventlog/tpm1: Simplify walking over *pos measurements Jia Zhang
2019-01-10 17:32 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-11  8:29   ` Jia Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190116220952.GH25803@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=tweek@google.com \
    --cc=zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).