* [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add linux-security-module mailing list to TPM drivers
@ 2019-02-20 3:58 Jerry Snitselaar
2019-02-20 7:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Snitselaar @ 2019-02-20 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-integrity
Cc: linux-security-module, linux-kernel, Peter Huewe,
Jarkko Sakkinen, Jason Gunthorpe
I've seen requests to add linux-security-module to tpm patch
submissions a couple of times recently, so just add the list
to MAINTAINERS so get_maintainers.pl will mention it.
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 41ce5f4ad838..cd0a3aecba65 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -15477,6 +15477,7 @@ M: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
M: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
R: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
L: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
+L: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-integrity/list/
W: https://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity
T: git git://git.infradead.org/users/jjs/linux-tpmdd.git
--
2.20.1.98.gecbdaf0899
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add linux-security-module mailing list to TPM drivers
2019-02-20 3:58 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add linux-security-module mailing list to TPM drivers Jerry Snitselaar
@ 2019-02-20 7:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-20 14:03 ` Jerry Snitselaar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-20 7:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jerry Snitselaar, jmorris
Cc: linux-integrity, linux-security-module, linux-kernel,
Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:58:46PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> I've seen requests to add linux-security-module to tpm patch
> submissions a couple of times recently, so just add the list
> to MAINTAINERS so get_maintainers.pl will mention it.
>
> Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
I guess James should say something about this.
/Jarkko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add linux-security-module mailing list to TPM drivers
2019-02-20 7:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
@ 2019-02-20 14:03 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-02-20 15:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Snitselaar @ 2019-02-20 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jarkko Sakkinen
Cc: jmorris, linux-integrity, linux-security-module, linux-kernel,
Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed Feb 20 19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:58:46PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>> I've seen requests to add linux-security-module to tpm patch
>> submissions a couple of times recently, so just add the list
>> to MAINTAINERS so get_maintainers.pl will mention it.
>>
>> Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
>> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
>> Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
>
>I guess James should say something about this.
>
>/Jarkko
Sorry, I meant to add James as well.
Maybe this isn't needed. Do you only want certain patches
being cc'd to linux-security-module? Looking back at
recent patches, it looked like it was a general request.
If it is, I'll be more likely to remember if get_maintainers.pl
brings it up. :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add linux-security-module mailing list to TPM drivers
2019-02-20 14:03 ` Jerry Snitselaar
@ 2019-02-20 15:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-20 20:49 ` James Morris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-20 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jmorris, linux-integrity, linux-security-module, linux-kernel,
Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 07:03:57AM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> On Wed Feb 20 19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:58:46PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > I've seen requests to add linux-security-module to tpm patch
> > > submissions a couple of times recently, so just add the list
> > > to MAINTAINERS so get_maintainers.pl will mention it.
> > >
> > > Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
> > > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
> >
> > I guess James should say something about this.
> >
> > /Jarkko
>
> Sorry, I meant to add James as well.
>
> Maybe this isn't needed. Do you only want certain patches
> being cc'd to linux-security-module? Looking back at
> recent patches, it looked like it was a general request.
> If it is, I'll be more likely to remember if get_maintainers.pl
> brings it up. :)
I'm all open here. Not sure which practices apply to IMA. I kind of tend
to dilate to question does it make sense to CC to LSM for two reasons:
1. I think the original reason was that tpmdd mailing list was small.
Now with the new linux-integrity mailing list up and running there is
more eyes looking at the code. And more importantly the people are
subscribed who use TPM for something, like IMA developers.
2. I don't remember ever reading within the time that I've been
maintaining even a single comment from anyone that works with LSM's. The
value of CC'ing there is not very significant, which means that most of
the time the TPM traffic is just noise on that list.
/Jarkko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add linux-security-module mailing list to TPM drivers
2019-02-20 15:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
@ 2019-02-20 20:49 ` James Morris
2019-02-20 22:39 ` Jerry Snitselaar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Morris @ 2019-02-20 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jarkko Sakkinen
Cc: linux-integrity, linux-security-module, linux-kernel,
Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > being cc'd to linux-security-module? Looking back at
> > recent patches, it looked like it was a general request.
> > If it is, I'll be more likely to remember if get_maintainers.pl
> > brings it up. :)
>
> I'm all open here. Not sure which practices apply to IMA. I kind of tend
> to dilate to question does it make sense to CC to LSM for two reasons:
>
> 1. I think the original reason was that tpmdd mailing list was small.
> Now with the new linux-integrity mailing list up and running there is
> more eyes looking at the code. And more importantly the people are
> subscribed who use TPM for something, like IMA developers.
> 2. I don't remember ever reading within the time that I've been
> maintaining even a single comment from anyone that works with LSM's. The
> value of CC'ing there is not very significant, which means that most of
> the time the TPM traffic is just noise on that list.
Sounds about right, there used to be more security folk on LSM and not as
many on the TPM list, but the new integrity list works well for TPM now.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add linux-security-module mailing list to TPM drivers
2019-02-20 20:49 ` James Morris
@ 2019-02-20 22:39 ` Jerry Snitselaar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Snitselaar @ 2019-02-20 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen, linux-integrity, linux-security-module,
linux-kernel, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu Feb 21 19, James Morris wrote:
>On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
>> > being cc'd to linux-security-module? Looking back at
>> > recent patches, it looked like it was a general request.
>> > If it is, I'll be more likely to remember if get_maintainers.pl
>> > brings it up. :)
>>
>> I'm all open here. Not sure which practices apply to IMA. I kind of tend
>> to dilate to question does it make sense to CC to LSM for two reasons:
>>
>> 1. I think the original reason was that tpmdd mailing list was small.
>> Now with the new linux-integrity mailing list up and running there is
>> more eyes looking at the code. And more importantly the people are
>> subscribed who use TPM for something, like IMA developers.
>> 2. I don't remember ever reading within the time that I've been
>> maintaining even a single comment from anyone that works with LSM's. The
>> value of CC'ing there is not very significant, which means that most of
>> the time the TPM traffic is just noise on that list.
>
>Sounds about right, there used to be more security folk on LSM and not as
>many on the TPM list, but the new integrity list works well for TPM now.
>
>
>--
>James Morris
><jmorris@namei.org>
>
Okay. Ignore this patch then.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-02-20 22:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-02-20 3:58 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add linux-security-module mailing list to TPM drivers Jerry Snitselaar
2019-02-20 7:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-20 14:03 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-02-20 15:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-20 20:49 ` James Morris
2019-02-20 22:39 ` Jerry Snitselaar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).