From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16501C43381 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE60F20851 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725826AbfBTWjG (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:39:06 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com ([209.85.160.193]:33193 "EHLO mail-qt1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725939AbfBTWjG (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:39:06 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id z39so29366118qtz.0 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:39:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ttnIK6/QFjYzU/D0HL40M0ZLJn988iAXS4P3Ni+3XTM=; b=oZLqLHqw3acd2KB3TO++F2vFKdU3Ho+OynFj7TQVydwnzpoV8+yjkSXolytt2UJoEk oIYi41HW5jmyDKsRZtmbORR6t5c6gjVQQXnhfEq9S/KH3uP0hZiVTiPnPWshksc6Iu1X fyTYHhBPt5jeiBkqVTw+KP2ddtZYixAmJlC2wb2Nu+r73JGr9+qrCX1Am7V7CUnojcMG GY7+L6FlwflATKPeWU2ViEsAcnTm/+H2BnaJQj0+7CBkyERS0bwfhy/hpGVdLZbVKvKf YNOOwZ6OwUPpoNgj2JqHKD/21cYw9akN+4qCW87oSLsQ7k+6Lv9CnpECthwnjj70AhbN bj+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubHe7HsWSOfdOgCf4fBWodLrT3TP8x55UT9TrTtSYzzthjel+sq G6gu6qnYcgH2oqL17nUwvXqDCQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaMcCyp5pbV1sONuz1OE54AJY5+2AxCVfFjU1uZ1GTb42Hm6M+VeK9FbjaUd52lPd6bnLgffQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:266d:: with SMTP id v42mr28676858qtv.116.1550702344991; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:39:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip72-223-3-97.ph.ph.cox.net. [72.223.3.97]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j11sm16616920qtk.26.2019.02.20.14.39.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:39:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:39:03 -0700 From: Jerry Snitselaar To: James Morris Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Huewe , Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add linux-security-module mailing list to TPM drivers Message-ID: <20190220223903.dusft4bbd33hu2qi@cantor> Reply-To: Jerry Snitselaar Mail-Followup-To: James Morris , Jarkko Sakkinen , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Huewe , Jason Gunthorpe References: <20190220035846.6272-1-jsnitsel@redhat.com> <20190220070413.GB23027@linux.intel.com> <20190220140357.5vbepgmexso3jc6d@cantor> <20190220150445.GA4794@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Thu Feb 21 19, James Morris wrote: >On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> > being cc'd to linux-security-module? Looking back at >> > recent patches, it looked like it was a general request. >> > If it is, I'll be more likely to remember if get_maintainers.pl >> > brings it up. :) >> >> I'm all open here. Not sure which practices apply to IMA. I kind of tend >> to dilate to question does it make sense to CC to LSM for two reasons: >> >> 1. I think the original reason was that tpmdd mailing list was small. >> Now with the new linux-integrity mailing list up and running there is >> more eyes looking at the code. And more importantly the people are >> subscribed who use TPM for something, like IMA developers. >> 2. I don't remember ever reading within the time that I've been >> maintaining even a single comment from anyone that works with LSM's. The >> value of CC'ing there is not very significant, which means that most of >> the time the TPM traffic is just noise on that list. > >Sounds about right, there used to be more security folk on LSM and not as >many on the TPM list, but the new integrity list works well for TPM now. > > >-- >James Morris > > Okay. Ignore this patch then.