From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scripts/ima: define a set of common functions
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 10:44:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190308024450.GC7223@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1551366343.10911.173.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On 02/28/19 at 10:05am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 21:41 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi Mimi,
> >
> > Sorry for jumping in late, just noticed this kexec selftests, I think we
> > also need a kexec load test not only for ima, but for general kexec
>
> The IMA kselftest tests are for the coordination between the different
> methods of verifying file signatures. In particular, for the kexec
> kernel image and kernel module signatures.
>
> The initial IMA kselftest just verifies that in an environment
> requiring signed kexec kernel images, the kexec_load syscall fails.
>
> This week I posted additional IMA kselftests[1][2], including one for
> the kexec_file_load syscall. I would really appreciate these
> kselftests being reviewed/acked.
>
> Mimi
>
> [1] Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] selftests/ima: add kexec and kernel module tests
> [2] Patches available from the "next-queued-testing" branch
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git/
>
Hi Mimi,
Still did not get change to have a look at V2, but seems you missed the
last chunk of comments about the secure boot mode in previous reply?
I just copy it hear:
'''
Do you want to get the Secureboot status here?
I got some advice from Peter Jones previously, thus we have below
in our kdump scripts:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/kexec-tools.git/tree/kdump-lib.sh
See the function is_secure_boot_enforced(), probably you can refer to
that function and check setup mode as well.
'''
Thanks
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-08 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 18:55 [PATCH 0/3] selftest/ima: add kexec_file_load test Mimi Zohar
2019-01-31 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftest/ima: cleanup the kexec selftest Mimi Zohar
2019-02-03 20:52 ` Petr Vorel
2019-01-31 18:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] scripts/ima: define a set of common functions Mimi Zohar
2019-02-03 21:19 ` Petr Vorel
2019-02-28 13:41 ` Dave Young
2019-02-28 15:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-03-08 2:44 ` Dave Young [this message]
2019-03-08 13:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-01-31 18:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests/ima: kexec_file_load syscall test Mimi Zohar
2019-02-03 22:02 ` Petr Vorel
2019-02-04 13:49 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190308024450.GC7223@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com \
--to=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).