Re: [PATCH] KEYS: asym_tpm: Switch to get_random_bytes()

[Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>]

On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 12:51:25AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 02:53:47PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > [Cc'ing David Safford]
> > 
> > On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 20:58 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 09:02:32AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 14:41 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 10:00:19AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 20:16 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > > > > Only the kernel random pool should be used for generating random numbers.
> > > > > > > TPM contributes to that pool among the other sources of entropy. In here it
> > > > > > > is not, agreed, absolutely critical because TPM is what is trusted anyway
> > > > > > > but in order to remove tpm_get_random() we need to first remove all the
> > > > > > > call sites.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > At what point during boot is the kernel random pool available?  Does
> > > > > > this imply that you're planning on changing trusted keys as well?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well trusted keys *must* be changed to use it. It is not a choice
> > > > > because using a proprietary random number generator instead of defacto
> > > > > one in the kernel can be categorized as a *regression*.
> > > > 
> > > > I really don't see how using the TPM random number for TPM trusted
> > > > keys would be considered a regression.  That by definition is a
> > > > trusted key.  If anything, changing what is currently being done would
> > > > be the regression. 
> > > 
> > > It is really not a TPM trusted key. It trusted key that gets sealed with
> > > the TPM. The key itself is used in clear by kernel. The random number
> > > generator exists in the kernel to for a reason.
> > > 
> > > It is without doubt a regression.
> > 
> > You're misusing the term "regression" here.  A regression is something
> > that previously worked and has stopped working.  In this case, trusted
> > keys has always been based on the TPM random number generator.  Before
> > changing this, there needs to be some guarantees that the kernel
> > random number generator has a pool of random numbers early, on all
> > systems including embedded devices, not just servers.
> 
> I'm not using the term regression incorrectly here. Wrong function
> was used to generate random numbers for the payload here. It is an
> obvious bug.

At the time when trusted keys was introduced I'd say that it was a wrong
design decision and badly implemented code. But you are right in that as
far that code is considered it would unfair to speak of a regression.

asym-tpm.c on the other hand this is fresh new code. There has been
*countless* of discussions over the years that random numbers should
come from multiple sources of entropy. There is no other categorization
than a bug for the tpm_get_random() there.

/Jarkko