From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC67CA9ED0 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 20:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226632086D for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 20:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727597AbfKAUUH (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2019 16:20:07 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:55656 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726477AbfKAUUH (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2019 16:20:07 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Nov 2019 13:20:06 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,256,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="226138430" Received: from bklaps-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.27.20]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2019 13:19:58 -0700 Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 22:19:57 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Sumit Garg Cc: Jens Wiklander , dhowells@redhat.com, Jonathan Corbet , jejb@linux.ibm.com, Mimi Zohar , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Casey Schaufler , Ard Biesheuvel , Daniel Thompson , Stuart Yoder , Janne Karhunen , "open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Linux Doc Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel , "tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" Subject: Re: [Patch v3 6/7] doc: keys: Document usage of TEE based Trusted Keys Message-ID: <20191101201957.GA8369@linux.intel.com> References: <1572530323-14802-1-git-send-email-sumit.garg@linaro.org> <1572530323-14802-7-git-send-email-sumit.garg@linaro.org> <20191031214745.GG10507@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 03:04:18PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > Isn't this statement contradicting with your earlier statement > regarding the right order would be to complete TEE patches review > first and then come up with documentation here [2]? > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/1568025601.4614.253.camel@linux.ibm.com/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20190909163643.qxmzpcggi567hmhv@linux.intel.com/ With the intersecting issues, namely key generation and conflicting keyctl parameters, that was not a well considered statement. /Jarkko