From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5521C433E0 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D84C20720 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731698AbgFWAun (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:50:43 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:3802 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731526AbgFWAum (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:50:42 -0400 IronPort-SDR: Zjqf4XvfGRdjFl7zUBQCRnyRQODuGd4Twn9aoJR5bMYU8/ja+UgPaQstSzBYwykBabtQUF2gfm VI0umvLrXOPw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9660"; a="228576385" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,268,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="228576385" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jun 2020 17:50:41 -0700 IronPort-SDR: NQZ2b+kbGeudWWVrnRpJr4mCx+Xzw+yu2KbiQYirZ5UPucKt2IqPwMYdi7GcuJMa26OHkjLr+B 3bIWN0DPA74A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,268,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="275174181" Received: from jczajka-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.249.40.133]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2020 17:50:36 -0700 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:50:34 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Jens Wiklander Cc: Maxim Uvarov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" , peterhuewe@gmx.de, Jason Gunthorpe , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Sumit Garg Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/3] optee: register drivers on optee bus Message-ID: <20200623005034.GC28795@linux.intel.com> References: <20200604175851.758-1-maxim.uvarov@linaro.org> <20200616082907.GA2305431@jade> <20200617233755.GI62794@linux.intel.com> <20200618075613.GA97184@jade> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200618075613.GA97184@jade> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 02:37:55AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:29:07AM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote: > > > Hi Maxim and Jarkko, > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 05:32:40PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > > > ping. > > > > Patchset was reviewed and all comments are codeverd. Optee-os patches > > > > were merged. These kernel patches look like they are hanging > > > > somewhere... > > > > > > I'm almost OK with this patchset, except that > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices needs to be updated > > > for the new kernel version and TEE mailing list which we're changing right > > > now. > > > > > > The last patch touches files I'm not maintainer of. That patch depends > > > on the previous patches so it makes sense to keep them together. If a > > > TPM device driver maintainer would ack that patch I can take it via my > > > tree. Or we can do it the other way around (with a v9 patchset), > > > whichever is preferred. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Jens > > > > Probably easier if you pick all three and I ack the one touching TPM. > > Makes sense, let's do that. Great, thanks! /Jarkko