linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Sergey Temerkhanov <s.temerkhanov@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: Rework open/close/shutdown to avoid races
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 13:56:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201215175624.GG5487@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201215133801.546207-1-s.temerkhanov@gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 04:38:01PM +0300, Sergey Temerkhanov wrote:
> Avoid race condition at shutdown by shutting downn the TPM 2.0
> devices synchronously. This eliminates the condition when the
> shutdown sequence sets chip->ops to NULL leading to the following:
> 
> [ 1586.593561][ T8669] tpm2_del_space+0x28/0x73
> [ 1586.598718][ T8669] tpmrm_release+0x27/0x33wq
> [ 1586.603774][ T8669] __fput+0x109/0x1d
> [ 1586.608380][ T8669] task_work_run+0x7c/0x90
> [ 1586.613414][ T8669] prepare_exit_to_usermode+0xb8/0x128
> [ 1586.619522][ T8669] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> [ 1586.626068][ T8669] RIP: 0033:0x4cb4bb
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Temerkhanov <s.temerkhanov@gmail.com>
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c  |  2 ++
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev.c   | 20 +++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpmrm-dev.c |  3 +++
>  include/linux/tpm.h          |  6 ++++--
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> index ddaeceb7e109..e94148b8e180 100644
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> @@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static int tpm_class_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct tpm_chip *chip = container_of(dev, struct tpm_chip, dev);
>  
> +	wait_event_idle(chip->waitq, !atomic_read(&chip->refcount));
>  	down_write(&chip->ops_sem);
>  	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
>  		if (!tpm_chip_start(chip)) {
> @@ -330,6 +331,7 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
>  
>  	mutex_init(&chip->tpm_mutex);
>  	init_rwsem(&chip->ops_sem);
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&chip->waitq);
>  
>  	chip->ops = ops;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev.c
> index e2c0baa69fef..8558f0f7382c 100644
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev.c
> @@ -19,27 +19,32 @@ static int tpm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
>  	struct tpm_chip *chip;
>  	struct file_priv *priv;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	chip = container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct tpm_chip, cdev);
>  
>  	/* It's assured that the chip will be opened just once,
> -	 * by the check of is_open variable, which is protected
> -	 * by driver_lock. */
> -	if (test_and_set_bit(0, &chip->is_open)) {
> +	 * by the check of the chip reference count.
> +	 */
> +	if (atomic_fetch_inc(&chip->refcount)) {

Use a refcount_t for all this

> @@ -39,6 +40,8 @@ static int tpmrm_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>
>  	tpm_common_release(file, fpriv);
>  	tpm2_del_space(fpriv->chip, &priv->space);
> +	atomic_dec(&fpriv->chip->refcount);
> +	wake_up_all(&fpriv->chip->waitq);

The usual pattern is

        if (refcount_dec_and_test(&fpriv->chip->refcount))
	   wake_up_all(&fpriv->chip->waitq);

But this seems like madness, this blocks tpm_class_shutdown until
userspace closes a file descriptor, can't do it.

You need to have tpm_class_shutdown() remove the ops from the still
open FD and have that FD start returning -EIO when the ops are gone,
which is what the ops lock is already for.

Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-15 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-15 13:38 Sergey Temerkhanov
2020-12-15 17:08 ` kernel test robot
2020-12-15 17:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-12-15 18:51 ` James Bottomley
2020-12-17 21:05   ` James Bottomley
2022-03-07 15:41   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-07 16:22     ` James Bottomley
2022-03-07 16:44       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-07 16:45         ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201215175624.GG5487@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=s.temerkhanov@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: Rework open/close/shutdown to avoid races' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).