linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Hao Wu <hao.wu@rubrik.com>
Cc: shrihari.kalkar@rubrik.com, seungyeop.han@rubrik.com,
	anish.jhaveri@rubrik.com, peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de,
	kgold@linux.ibm.com, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	why2jjj.linux@gmail.com, hamza@hpe.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tpm: fix Atmel TPM crash caused by too frequent queries
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 05:46:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210727024644.frkuo4a6ssyz6uhc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210711075122.30056-1-hao.wu@rubrik.com>

On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 12:51:22AM -0700, Hao Wu wrote:
> The Atmel TPM 1.2 chips crash with error
> `tpm_try_transmit: send(): error -62` since kernel 4.14.
> It is observed from the kernel log after running `tpm_sealdata -z`.
> The error thrown from the command is as follows
> ```
> $ tpm_sealdata -z
> Tspi_Key_LoadKey failed: 0x00001087 - layer=tddl,
> code=0087 (135), I/O error
> ```
> 
> The issue was reproduced with the following Atmel TPM chip:
> ```
> $ tpm_version
> T0  TPM 1.2 Version Info:
>   Chip Version:        1.2.66.1
>   Spec Level:          2
>   Errata Revision:     3
>   TPM Vendor ID:       ATML
>   TPM Version:         01010000
>   Manufacturer Info:   41544d4c
> ```
> 
> The root cause of the issue is due to the TPM calls to msleep()
> were replaced with usleep_range() [1], which reduces
> the actual timeout. Via experiments, it is observed that
> the original msleep(5) actually sleeps for 15ms.
> Because of a known timeout issue in Atmel TPM 1.2 chip,
> the shorter timeout than 15ms can cause the error described above.
> 
> A few further changes in kernel 4.16 [2] and 4.18 [3, 4] further
> reduced the timeout to less than 1ms. With experiments,
> the problematic timeout in the latest kernel is the one
> for `wait_for_tpm_stat`.
> 
> To fix it, the patch reverts the timeout of `wait_for_tpm_stat`
> to 15ms for all Atmel TPM 1.2 chips, but leave it untouched
> for Ateml TPM 2.0 chip, and chips from other vendors.
> As explained above, the chosen 15ms timeout is
> the actual timeout before this issue introduced,
> thus the old value is used here.
> Particularly, TPM_ATML_TIMEOUT_WAIT_STAT_MIN is set to 14700us,
> TPM_ATML_TIMEOUT_WAIT_STAT_MIN is set to 15000us according to
> the existing TPM_TIMEOUT_RANGE_US (300us).
> The fixed has been tested in the system with the affected Atmel chip
> with no issues observed after boot up.
> 
> References:
> [1] 9f3fc7bcddcb tpm: replace msleep() with usleep_range() in TPM
> 1.2/2.0 generic drivers
> [2] cf151a9a44d5 tpm: reduce tpm polling delay in tpm_tis_core
> [3] 59f5a6b07f64 tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()
> [4] 424eaf910c32 tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer
> granularity
> 
> Fixes: 9f3fc7bcddcb ("tpm: replace msleep() with usleep_range() in TPM 1.2/2.0 generic drivers")
> Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-integrity/patch/20200926223150.109645-1-hao.wu@rubrik.com/
> Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.wu@rubrik.com>
> ---
> This version (v3) removes unnecessary condition check
> in `wait_for_tpm_stat`.

Missing change long v1 -> v2.

Please do something like

v3:
- ...

v2:
- ...

> 
> Test Plan:
> - Run fixed kernel with ATMEL TPM chips and see crash
> has been fixed.
> - Run fixed kernel with non-ATMEL TPM chips, and confirm
> the timeout has not been changed.
> 
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h          |  6 ++++--
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/tpm.h             |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> index 283f78211c3a..6de1b44c4aab 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> @@ -41,8 +41,10 @@ enum tpm_timeout {
>  	TPM_TIMEOUT_RETRY = 100, /* msecs */
>  	TPM_TIMEOUT_RANGE_US = 300,	/* usecs */
>  	TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL = 1,	/* msecs */
> -	TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MIN = 100,      /* usecs */
> -	TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MAX = 500      /* usecs */
> +	TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MIN = 100,	/* usecs */
> +	TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MAX = 500,	/* usecs */

What is going on here?

These lines should not change.

> +	TPM_ATML_TIMEOUT_WAIT_STAT_MIN = 14700,	/* usecs */
> +	TPM_ATML_TIMEOUT_WAIT_STAT_MAX = 15000	/* usecs */

Move these definitions to tpm_tis_core.h. They are only useful
for a single driver.


>  };
>  
>  /* TPM addresses */
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index 55b9d3965ae1..2de1f71e8ae1 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
>  		}
>  	} else {
>  		do {
> -			usleep_range(TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MIN,
> -				     TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MAX);
> +			usleep_range(chip->timeout_wait_stat_min,
> +				     chip->timeout_wait_stat_max);
>  			status = chip->ops->status(chip);
>  			if ((status & mask) == mask)
>  				return 0;
> @@ -934,6 +934,9 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
>  	chip->timeout_b = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_TIMEOUT_B_MAX);
>  	chip->timeout_c = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_TIMEOUT_C_MAX);
>  	chip->timeout_d = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_TIMEOUT_D_MAX);
> +	/* init timeouts for wait_for_tpm_stat */

Remove this comment.

> +	chip->timeout_wait_stat_min = TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MIN;
> +	chip->timeout_wait_stat_max = TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MAX;
>  	priv->phy_ops = phy_ops;
>  	dev_set_drvdata(&chip->dev, priv);
>  
> @@ -983,6 +986,13 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
>  
>  	priv->manufacturer_id = vendor;
>  
> +	if (priv->manufacturer_id == TPM_VID_ATML &&
> +		!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)) {
> +		/* If TPM chip is 1.2 ATMEL chip, timeout need to be relaxed*/
> +		chip->timeout_wait_stat_min = TPM_ATML_TIMEOUT_WAIT_STAT_MIN;
> +		chip->timeout_wait_stat_max = TPM_ATML_TIMEOUT_WAIT_STAT_MAX;
> +	}
> +
>  	rc = tpm_tis_read8(priv, TPM_RID(0), &rid);
>  	if (rc < 0)
>  		goto out_err;
> diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h
> index aa11fe323c56..171b9102c976 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tpm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h
> @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ struct tpm_chip {
>  	bool timeout_adjusted;
>  	unsigned long duration[TPM_NUM_DURATIONS]; /* jiffies */
>  	bool duration_adjusted;
> +	unsigned int timeout_wait_stat_min; /* usecs */
> +	unsigned int timeout_wait_stat_max; /* usecs */
>  
>  	struct dentry *bios_dir[TPM_NUM_EVENT_LOG_FILES];
>  
> @@ -269,6 +271,7 @@ enum tpm2_cc_attrs {
>  #define TPM_VID_INTEL    0x8086
>  #define TPM_VID_WINBOND  0x1050
>  #define TPM_VID_STM      0x104A
> +#define TPM_VID_ATML     0x1114
>  
>  enum tpm_chip_flags {
>  	TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2		= BIT(1),
> -- 
> 2.29.0.vfs.0.0
> 
> 

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-27  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-20 23:18 [PATCH] Fix Atmel TPM crash caused by too frequent queries Hao Wu
2021-06-23 13:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-24  5:49   ` Hao Wu
2021-06-29 20:06     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-30  4:27       ` Hao Wu
2021-06-24  5:33 ` Hao Wu
2021-06-29 20:07   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-30  4:22   ` [PATCH] tpm: fix ATMEL " Hao Wu
2021-07-02  6:35     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-02  7:12       ` Greg KH
2021-07-02  7:33       ` Hao Wu
2021-07-02  7:35         ` Hao Wu
2021-07-02  7:45         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-02  7:59           ` Hao Wu
2021-07-02  8:42             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-02 11:57               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-02 19:16                 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-05  5:19                   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-05  5:29                     ` Hao Wu
2021-07-04  0:07     ` Hao Wu
2021-07-05  7:15       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-05 23:09         ` Hao Wu
2021-07-06 12:34           ` Mimi Zohar
2021-07-07  4:18             ` Hao Wu
2021-07-07  4:34               ` Hao Wu
2021-07-07  4:31     ` [PATCH v2] " Hao Wu
2021-07-07  9:24       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-07 18:28         ` Hao Wu
2021-07-07 21:10           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-09  4:43             ` Hao Wu
2021-07-09  4:40     ` [PATCH v2] tpm: fix Atmel " Hao Wu
2021-07-09 17:47       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-09 19:23         ` Hao Wu
2021-07-11  7:37           ` Hao Wu
2021-07-16  5:30             ` Hao Wu
2021-07-11  7:51       ` [PATCH v3] " Hao Wu
2021-07-27  2:46         ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2021-07-27  3:40           ` Hao Wu
2021-08-14 22:25         ` [PATCH v4] " Hao Wu
2021-08-26  5:38           ` Hao Wu
2021-08-26 16:24             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-08-27  0:35               ` Hao Wu
2021-09-04 21:14                 ` Hao Wu
2021-09-04 23:15                   ` Hao Wu
2021-09-05  3:51           ` [PATCH v5] " Hao Wu
2021-09-07 17:43             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-08  8:33               ` Hao Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210727024644.frkuo4a6ssyz6uhc@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=anish.jhaveri@rubrik.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hamza@hpe.com \
    --cc=hao.wu@rubrik.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kgold@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=seungyeop.han@rubrik.com \
    --cc=shrihari.kalkar@rubrik.com \
    --cc=why2jjj.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).