From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B50C43217 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 10:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230268AbiLAKHG (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 05:07:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40652 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230221AbiLAKHE (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 05:07:04 -0500 Received: from frasgout11.his.huawei.com (frasgout11.his.huawei.com [14.137.139.23]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6559A89ADA; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 02:07:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.228]) by frasgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NNBQ64lnDz9xFVK; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:59:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.204.63.22]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id LxC2BwCnkm+tfIhjWgGvAA--.50191S3; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:06:49 +0100 (CET) From: Roberto Sassu To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roberto Sassu , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] evm: Alloc evm_digest in evm_verify_hmac() if CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:06:24 +0100 Message-Id: <20221201100625.916781-2-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20221201100625.916781-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> References: <20221201100625.916781-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: LxC2BwCnkm+tfIhjWgGvAA--.50191S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxJF4xCry8tryxGr45Cr18uFg_yoW5XFWkpa 1kK3WIqr4rJr1fKFy3CF4Yy3WrKrW0qry2gwsxAw1YvFnxXr1Fy34IyFy7XryrKrW8XFy7 taySqFn8Ca1UA3DanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUP2b4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26ryj6rWUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUCVW8JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV WxJVW8Jr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8JVWxJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_ Gr0_Gr1UM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMc Ij6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r106r15McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_ Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka0xkIwI1lc7CjxVAaw2AFwI 0_GFv_Wryl42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG 67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1q6r43MI IYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E 14v26F4j6r4UJwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr 0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU0xs qJUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: purev21wro2thvvxqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/1tbiAQANBF1jj4YhZgAAs4 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org From: Roberto Sassu Commit ac4e97abce9b8 ("scatterlist: sg_set_buf() argument must be in linear mapping") checks that both the signature and the digest reside in the linear mapping area. However, more recently commit ba14a194a434c ("fork: Add generic vmalloced stack support"), made it possible to move the stack in the vmalloc area, which is not contiguous, and thus not suitable for sg_set_buf() which needs adjacent pages. Fix this by checking if CONFIG_VMAP_STACK is enabled. If yes, allocate an evm_digest structure, and use that instead of the in-stack counterpart. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9.x Fixes: ba14a194a434 ("fork: Add generic vmalloced stack support") Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu --- security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index 23d484e05e6f..7f76d6103f2e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry, struct signature_v2_hdr *hdr; enum integrity_status evm_status = INTEGRITY_PASS; struct evm_digest digest; + struct evm_digest *digest_ptr = &digest; struct inode *inode; int rc, xattr_len, evm_immutable = 0; @@ -231,14 +232,26 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry, } hdr = (struct signature_v2_hdr *)xattr_data; - digest.hdr.algo = hdr->hash_algo; + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK)) { + digest_ptr = kmalloc(sizeof(*digest_ptr), GFP_NOFS); + if (!digest_ptr) { + rc = -ENOMEM; + break; + } + } + + digest_ptr->hdr.algo = hdr->hash_algo; + rc = evm_calc_hash(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value, - xattr_value_len, xattr_data->type, &digest); + xattr_value_len, xattr_data->type, + digest_ptr); if (rc) break; rc = integrity_digsig_verify(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_EVM, (const char *)xattr_data, xattr_len, - digest.digest, digest.hdr.length); + digest_ptr->digest, + digest_ptr->hdr.length); if (!rc) { inode = d_backing_inode(dentry); @@ -268,8 +281,11 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry, else evm_status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; } - pr_debug("digest: (%d) [%*phN]\n", digest.hdr.length, digest.hdr.length, - digest.digest); + pr_debug("digest: (%d) [%*phN]\n", digest_ptr->hdr.length, + digest_ptr->hdr.length, digest_ptr->digest); + + if (digest_ptr && digest_ptr != &digest) + kfree(digest_ptr); out: if (iint) iint->evm_status = evm_status; -- 2.25.1