From: Hao Wu <hao.wu@rubrik.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc: Shrihari Kalkar <shrihari.kalkar@rubrik.com>,
Seungyeop Han <seungyeop.han@rubrik.com>,
Anish Jhaveri <anish.jhaveri@rubrik.com>,
peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
Ken Goldman <kgold@linux.ibm.com>,
zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, why2jjj.linux@gmail.com,
Hamza Attak <hamza@hpe.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de,
Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Atmel TPM crash caused by too frequent queries
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 21:27:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20A0208C-FC96-4788-B59C-6019A5A32EF9@rubrik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210629200628.slv7fnjxsmnvv2cf@kernel.org>
> On Jun 29, 2021, at 1:06 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:49:27PM -0700, Hao Wu wrote:
>>> On Jun 23, 2021, at 6:35 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 04:18:09PM -0700, Hao Wu wrote:
>>>> This is a fix for the ATMEL TPM crash bug reported in
>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-integrity/patch/20200926223150.109645-1-hao.wu@rubrik.com/
>>>>
>>>> According to the discussions in the original thread,
>>>> we don't want to revert the timeout of wait_for_tpm_stat
>>>> for non-ATMEL chips, which brings back the performance cost.
>>>> For investigation and analysis of why wait_for_tpm_stat
>>>> caused the issue, and how the regression was introduced,
>>>> please read the original thread above.
>>>>
>>>> Thus the proposed fix here is to only revert the timeout
>>>> for ATMEL chips by checking the vendor ID.
>>>>
>>>> Test Plan:
>>>> - Run fixed kernel with ATMEL TPM chips and see crash
>>>> has been fixed.
>>>> - Run fixed kernel with non-ATMEL TPM chips, and confirm
>>>> the timeout has not been changed.
>>>
>>> Please move test plan right before diffstat if you wan to include such,
>>> so that it does not go into the commit log.
>> Hi Jarkko, not sure I understood your suggestion or not. I removed
>> the test plan from the commit message in a updated commit
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-integrity/patch/20210624053321.861-1-hao.wu@rubrik.com/
>>
>> Let me know if I misunderstood this. I am fine to not include test plan,
>> If this is not something expected by linux community.
>> I personally think it is helpful to understand the confidence of the commit.
>>
>>>
>>>> ---
>
> You can add it right here. Then it won't be included to the actual
> commit log but is still available in the patch.
>
I see, thanks Jarkko. Updated the patch
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-integrity/patch/20210630042205.30051-1-hao.wu@rubrik.com/
Hopefull it makes more sense now.
> /Jarkko
Hao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-20 23:18 [PATCH] Fix Atmel TPM crash caused by too frequent queries Hao Wu
2021-06-23 13:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-24 5:49 ` Hao Wu
2021-06-29 20:06 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-30 4:27 ` Hao Wu [this message]
2021-06-24 5:33 ` Hao Wu
2021-06-29 20:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-30 4:22 ` [PATCH] tpm: fix ATMEL " Hao Wu
2021-07-02 6:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-02 7:12 ` Greg KH
2021-07-02 7:33 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-02 7:35 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-02 7:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-02 7:59 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-02 8:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-02 11:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-02 19:16 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-05 5:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-05 5:29 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-04 0:07 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-05 7:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-05 23:09 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-06 12:34 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-07-07 4:18 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-07 4:34 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-07 4:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Hao Wu
2021-07-07 9:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-07 18:28 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-07 21:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-09 4:43 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-09 4:40 ` [PATCH v2] tpm: fix Atmel " Hao Wu
2021-07-09 17:47 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-09 19:23 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-11 7:37 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-16 5:30 ` Hao Wu
2021-07-11 7:51 ` [PATCH v3] " Hao Wu
2021-07-27 2:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-27 3:40 ` Hao Wu
2021-08-14 22:25 ` [PATCH v4] " Hao Wu
2021-08-26 5:38 ` Hao Wu
2021-08-26 16:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-08-27 0:35 ` Hao Wu
2021-09-04 21:14 ` Hao Wu
2021-09-04 23:15 ` Hao Wu
2021-09-05 3:51 ` [PATCH v5] " Hao Wu
2021-09-07 17:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-09-08 8:33 ` Hao Wu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-09-26 22:31 [PATCH] Fix " Hao Wu
2020-09-26 22:57 ` James Bottomley
2020-09-26 23:10 ` Hao Wu
2020-09-27 18:25 ` James Bottomley
2020-09-28 0:11 ` Hao Wu
2020-09-28 0:15 ` Hao Wu
2020-09-28 1:22 ` James Bottomley
2020-09-28 5:59 ` Hao Wu
2020-09-28 22:11 ` James Bottomley
2020-09-29 4:46 ` Hao Wu
2020-09-30 2:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-30 14:54 ` James Bottomley
2020-09-30 15:37 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-30 20:48 ` James Bottomley
2020-09-30 21:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-30 22:31 ` James Bottomley
2020-10-01 1:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-01 4:53 ` James Bottomley
2020-10-01 18:15 ` Nayna
2020-10-01 18:32 ` James Bottomley
2020-10-01 23:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-17 6:11 ` Hao Wu
2020-10-18 5:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-18 5:20 ` Hao Wu
2020-11-14 4:39 ` Hao Wu
2020-11-18 21:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-18 23:23 ` Hao Wu
2021-05-09 6:18 ` Hao Wu
2021-05-09 6:31 ` Hao Wu
2021-05-10 2:17 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-10 3:15 ` Hao Wu
2021-05-10 17:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-28 1:08 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-28 6:03 ` Hao Wu
2020-09-28 14:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-28 17:49 ` Hao Wu
2020-09-28 19:47 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-28 20:27 ` Hao Wu
2020-09-30 2:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-30 3:41 ` Hao Wu
[not found] ` <EA1EE8F8-F054-4E1B-B830-231398D33CB8@rubrik.com>
2020-10-01 14:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-14 6:13 Hao Wu
2020-09-14 6:17 ` Greg KH
2020-09-15 2:52 ` Hao Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20A0208C-FC96-4788-B59C-6019A5A32EF9@rubrik.com \
--to=hao.wu@rubrik.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=anish.jhaveri@rubrik.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hamza@hpe.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kgold@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=seungyeop.han@rubrik.com \
--cc=shrihari.kalkar@rubrik.com \
--cc=why2jjj.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).