From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9323C433E0 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE216206DA for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726515AbgHCOaD (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 10:30:03 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:19648 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726358AbgHCOaD (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 10:30:03 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 073E3XLq158955; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 10:29:58 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32pkeuj17k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:29:57 -0400 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 073E3pN3160931; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 10:29:57 -0400 Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32pkeuj16t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:29:57 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 073EKJOe009524; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:29:55 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 32n0182985-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 Aug 2020 14:29:54 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 073ETq1X27001098 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:29:52 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3FD11C04A; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:29:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A8011C050; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:29:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-f45666cc-3089-11b2-a85c-c57d1a57929f.ibm.com (unknown [9.160.52.50]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:29:51 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <22a744e9520237907312d1f71293df0dd809805f.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [ima-evm-utils: PATCH 5/5] ima-evm-utils: travis: openssl gost engine From: Mimi Zohar To: Petr Vorel Cc: Vitaly Chikunov , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Bruno Meneguele Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:29:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200803130755.GA30440@dell5510> References: <20200731182408.696931-1-zohar@linux.ibm.com> <20200731182408.696931-6-zohar@linux.ibm.com> <20200731185633.kqgcz4dwfa4ruyld@altlinux.org> <20200731201808.GA27841@dell5510> <20200731202638.x5mnkz7hcpgbveu2@altlinux.org> <20200731204044.GC27841@dell5510> <20200731210653.p5m4efy52melqwgs@altlinux.org> <8c9e64a3b461fb20cda761ef0fc0728a55448937.camel@linux.ibm.com> <1157c464d49cb6297fc2f20771d73a4cf7ce6599.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20200803130755.GA30440@dell5510> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-12.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-03_13:2020-08-03,2020-08-03 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008030106 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 15:07 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: > Hi all, > > > On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 18:32 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > > - Or even better, Bionic (which is supported by Travis) should have > > > > gost-engine already in the libengine-gost-openssl1.1 package. > > > > In that case `.travis.yml` should have `dist: bionic`. > > > > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/reference/bionic/ > > > Yes, for the internal git repo I made this change. The internal > > > travis support for bionic is different than the external > > > travis. I'll post what I have as an RFC. > > The internal travis support on ppc defaults to using Bionic, but the > > way of specifying it is different. > > +os: linux-ppc64le > > language: C > > addons: > > apt: > > @Mimi: As I wrote, I'd suggest moving to docker based travis. I can do it once > other issues are addressed, if this setup work for your internal travis support > as well. See examples .travis.yml [1] [2], builds: [3] [4]. > > Advantages are more realistic builds for distro maintainers (different libc and > libraries versions, you can test old and new distro releases, etc), but maybe > that's not what you want/need. > > Disadvantage is that sometimes docker releases have temporary packaging related > issues (first build in [3]; failure in first build [4] is a bug in LTP, corner > case, which would be otherwise undiscovered a long time). Nice! I definitely want to move to a docker based travis. How should we move forward? Should there be a 1.3.1 release now with just the few changes in the next branch and include the existing travis branch with changes to address Vitaly's comments? Mimi > > [1] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/.travis.yml > [2] https://github.com/iputils/iputils/blob/master/.travis.yml > [3] https://travis-ci.org/github/iputils/iputils/builds/714445071 > [4] https://travis-ci.org/github/linux-test-project/ltp/builds/714400199