linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Hao Wu <hao.wu@rubrik.com>,
	shrihari.kalkar@rubrik.com, seungyeop.han@rubrik.com,
	anish.jhaveri@rubrik.com, peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de,
	kgold@linux.ibm.com, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	why2jjj.linux@gmail.com, hamza@hpe.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] tpm: fix Atmel TPM crash caused by too frequent queries
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 17:08:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f3d10544a3f83e4a940896abeb80da948cba827.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210908092606.96115-1-hao.wu@rubrik.com>

On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 02:26 -0700, Hao Wu wrote:
> The Atmel TPM 1.2 chips crash with error
> `tpm_try_transmit: send(): error -62` since kernel 4.14.
> It is observed from the kernel log after running `tpm_sealdata -z`.
> The error thrown from the command is as follows
> ```
> $ tpm_sealdata -z
> Tspi_Key_LoadKey failed: 0x00001087 - layer=tddl,
> code=0087 (135), I/O error
> ```
> 
> The issue was reproduced with the following Atmel TPM chip:
> ```
> $ tpm_version
> T0  TPM 1.2 Version Info:
>   Chip Version:        1.2.66.1
>   Spec Level:          2
>   Errata Revision:     3
>   TPM Vendor ID:       ATML
>   TPM Version:         01010000
>   Manufacturer Info:   41544d4c
> ```
> 
> The root cause of the issue is due to the TPM calls to msleep()
> were replaced with usleep_range() [1], which reduces
> the actual timeout. Via experiments, it is observed that
> the original msleep(5) actually sleeps for 15ms.
> Because of a known timeout issue in Atmel TPM 1.2 chip,
> the shorter timeout than 15ms can cause the error described above.
> 
> A few further changes in kernel 4.16 [2] and 4.18 [3, 4] further
> reduced the timeout to less than 1ms. With experiments,
> the problematic timeout in the latest kernel is the one
> for `wait_for_tpm_stat`.
> 
> To fix it, the patch reverts the timeout of `wait_for_tpm_stat`
> to 15ms for all Atmel TPM 1.2 chips, but leave it untouched
> for Ateml TPM 2.0 chip, and chips from other vendors.
> As explained above, the chosen 15ms timeout is
> the actual timeout before this issue introduced,
> thus the old value is used here.
> Particularly, TPM_ATML_TIMEOUT_WAIT_STAT_MIN is set to 14700us,
> TPM_ATML_TIMEOUT_WAIT_STAT_MIN is set to 15000us according to
> the existing TPM_TIMEOUT_RANGE_US (300us).
> The fixed has been tested in the system with the affected Atmel chip
> with no issues observed after boot up.
> 
> References:
> [1] 9f3fc7bcddcb tpm: replace msleep() with usleep_range() in TPM
> 1.2/2.0 generic drivers
> [2] cf151a9a44d5 tpm: reduce tpm polling delay in tpm_tis_core
> [3] 59f5a6b07f64 tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()
> [4] 424eaf910c32 tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer
> granularity
> 
> Fixes: 9f3fc7bcddcb ("tpm: replace msleep() with usleep_range() in TPM 1.2/2.0 generic drivers")
> Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-integrity/patch/20200926223150.109645-1-hao.wu@rubrik.com/
> Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.wu@rubrik.com>

Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

/Jarkko


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-09 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-08  9:26 [PATCH v6] tpm: fix Atmel TPM crash caused by too frequent queries Hao Wu
2021-09-09 14:08 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2021-09-09 17:32   ` Hao Wu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-09-08  9:16 Hao Wu
2021-09-08  9:22 ` Hao Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3f3d10544a3f83e4a940896abeb80da948cba827.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=anish.jhaveri@rubrik.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hamza@hpe.com \
    --cc=hao.wu@rubrik.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kgold@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=seungyeop.han@rubrik.com \
    --cc=shrihari.kalkar@rubrik.com \
    --cc=why2jjj.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).