From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1769BC07E9B for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 16:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB652613CA for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232491AbhGIQCm (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 12:02:42 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:55718 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232351AbhGIQCl (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 12:02:41 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 169FWtDj181659; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:59:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=1Po+rMtMFJxfuFZqCeL6KxfLyqZR7O/9IyCglXOMvmw=; b=QRcFJ4IFOXT2/bFp1H7JBrOUzU/3dt7tXIjJjZcE9t6SkXFDRba3nFZEeZN0NZE8glbr PIEOQD1ixymNS4gABUbSJIQq1xk7Tn8O3qyB5wuo83sZKqc0UJVqZ0g/5YnIKLmzZ4ZK KdgjFia1ELuvwZ1oqMCyaW8bIiQ1Cz+WYWGdeTTwfmwueKmTf9qm2//w73qbG5YqOthW Dmjxp2Nrt+0OgszOoQc54rR6bvWD/gsJ78vV5E9u/gF2W/Dc9bOqaYRrklnpa0cTiLqZ 9QRyVwu2VUonUvJsPjD5cBl4e/wFpjNz+eZ4BFWThfDuY+sgbOkYFmAuaNF8QFVkHpb1 zA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 39phqkwh5x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 09 Jul 2021 11:59:24 -0400 Received: from m0098396.ppops.net (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 169FX7Bo182394; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:59:23 -0400 Received: from ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (1a.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.26]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 39phqkwh5e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 09 Jul 2021 11:59:23 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 169FwB1J028432; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:59:22 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.29]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 39ju3dn5hq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:59:22 +0000 Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.107]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 169FxLoY37945660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:59:21 GMT Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740BE124073; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:59:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A6C124066; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:59:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-4b5937cc-25c4-11b2-a85c-cea3a66903e4.ibm.com (unknown [9.163.3.233]) by b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:59:15 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/12] Enroll kernel keys thru MOK To: Mimi Zohar , Eric Snowberg Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Herbert Xu , "David S . Miller" , Jarkko Sakkinen , James Morris , "Serge E . Hallyn" , keescook@chromium.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, scott.branden@broadcom.com, weiyongjun1@huawei.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com, ebiggers@google.com, ardb@kernel.org, nramas@linux.microsoft.com, lszubowi@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, pjones@redhat.com, glin@suse.com, "konrad.wilk@oracle.com" References: <20210707024403.1083977-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com> <42b787dd3a20fe37c4de60daf75db06e409cfb6d.camel@linux.ibm.com> <5BFB3C52-36D4-47A5-B1B8-977717C555A0@oracle.com> <886f30dcf7b3d48644289acc3601c2f0207b19b6.camel@linux.ibm.com> <21EFCB58-2D89-4D30-8DA2-B952A7E1B1BD@oracle.com> <490941a5197bf4bcf0d6f95610085ee4d46ed9bb.camel@linux.ibm.com> <839EF700-7A2C-4282-AF97-768FAD1A9957@oracle.com> From: Nayna Message-ID: <51434508-e2ad-c9f9-2612-2a9162cec71d@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:59:15 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: m6PXIplm1CJI8HDYe7ntOIno-_i_X63y X-Proofpoint-GUID: WKRt1Pulw0vog-lQfrySLYMyxXTXdSvD X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.790 definitions=2021-07-09_09:2021-07-09,2021-07-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2107090078 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On 7/8/21 9:10 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > Definitely not ".trusted_platform" keyring, as it would be too > confusing with the existing "trusted" key type [1]. At least for now, > leave it as ".mok". Since this keyring is meant only for "CA" keys, can we name it as ".ca" ? Thanks & Regards,     - Nayna