From: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Getting weird TPM error after rebasing my tree to security/next-general
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 19:47:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9DA8DA75@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whYtqGO7v7c=Ak0xQfonGVbC_1sRHfxS4xNO-Sa6mFevw@mail.gmail.com>
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:52 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-
> foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > I think what I should do is to just make "memcpy_*io()" do the "align
> > naturally" thing.
> >
> > Let me cook up a patch for you to test.
>
> Does this work for you?
>
> I haven't tested it at all, but I verified that the generated code seems to make
> at least some amount of sense.
>
> Linus
So dig into the spec and I think this is a bit relevant.
TPM TCG according the spec requires that all buffer access is done sequentially from the start to end of the payload,
Simply In case of skipping or going back the transaction is aborted.
The write transactions should be 1 or power of 2. So in general 6 byte read should not work. But I'm sure our hw really obey this restriction.
Thanks
Tomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-31 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-18 14:25 Getting weird TPM error after rebasing my tree to security/next-general Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-18 22:09 ` James Bottomley
2019-01-20 16:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-22 1:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-22 2:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-22 13:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-22 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-23 15:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-23 18:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-29 13:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 12:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 16:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 17:06 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-31 18:47 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 18:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-31 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-31 19:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-31 19:47 ` Winkler, Tomas [this message]
2019-02-01 8:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 20:07 ` Winkler, Tomas
2019-01-31 20:47 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-31 23:31 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-02-01 11:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 20:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-01 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-04 11:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-23 20:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9DA8DA75@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).