linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	zohar@linux.ibm.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, prsriva02@gmail.com,
	tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ima: Return int in the functions to measure a buffer
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:21:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bc9d707-b193-6111-fea6-50c70e6f2245@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210705090922.3321178-3-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>

On 7/5/2021 2:09 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> ima_measure_critical_data() and process_buffer_measurement() currently
> don't return a result. A caller wouldn't be able to know whether those
> functions were executed successfully.
> 
> This patch modifies the return type from void to int, and returns 0 if the
> buffer has been successfully measured, a negative value otherwise.
> 
> Also, this patch does not modify the behavior of existing callers by
> processing the returned value. For those, the return value is ignored.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/ima.h               | 15 +++++++-----
>   security/integrity/ima/ima.h      | 10 ++++----
>   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>

  -lakshmi

> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h
> index 81e830d01ced..60492263aa64 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ima.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ima.h
> @@ -35,10 +35,10 @@ extern void ima_post_path_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
>   extern int ima_file_hash(struct file *file, char *buf, size_t buf_size);
>   extern int ima_inode_hash(struct inode *inode, char *buf, size_t buf_size);
>   extern void ima_kexec_cmdline(int kernel_fd, const void *buf, int size);
> -extern void ima_measure_critical_data(const char *event_label,
> -				      const char *event_name,
> -				      const void *buf, size_t buf_len,
> -				      bool hash);
> +extern int ima_measure_critical_data(const char *event_label,
> +				     const char *event_name,
> +				     const void *buf, size_t buf_len,
> +				     bool hash);
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM
>   extern void ima_appraise_parse_cmdline(void);
> @@ -144,10 +144,13 @@ static inline int ima_inode_hash(struct inode *inode, char *buf, size_t buf_size
>   
>   static inline void ima_kexec_cmdline(int kernel_fd, const void *buf, int size) {}
>   
> -static inline void ima_measure_critical_data(const char *event_label,
> +static inline int ima_measure_critical_data(const char *event_label,
>   					     const char *event_name,
>   					     const void *buf, size_t buf_len,
> -					     bool hash) {}
> +					     bool hash)
> +{
> +	return -ENOENT;
> +}
>   
>   #endif /* CONFIG_IMA */
>   
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> index f0e448ed1f9f..03db221324c3 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> @@ -264,11 +264,11 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file,
>   			   struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value,
>   			   int xattr_len, const struct modsig *modsig, int pcr,
>   			   struct ima_template_desc *template_desc);
> -void process_buffer_measurement(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> -				struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
> -				const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
> -				int pcr, const char *func_data,
> -				bool buf_hash);
> +int process_buffer_measurement(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> +			       struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
> +			       const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
> +			       int pcr, const char *func_data,
> +			       bool buf_hash);
>   void ima_audit_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
>   			   const unsigned char *filename);
>   int ima_alloc_init_template(struct ima_event_data *event_data,
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index 8ef1fa357e0c..b512c06d8ee1 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ int ima_post_load_data(char *buf, loff_t size,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -/*
> +/**
>    * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer or the buffer data hash
>    * @mnt_userns:	user namespace of the mount the inode was found from
>    * @inode: inode associated with the object being measured (NULL for KEY_CHECK)
> @@ -840,12 +840,15 @@ int ima_post_load_data(char *buf, loff_t size,
>    * @buf_hash: measure buffer data hash
>    *
>    * Based on policy, either the buffer data or buffer data hash is measured
> + *
> + * Return: 0 if the buffer has been successfully measured, a negative value
> + * otherwise.
>    */
> -void process_buffer_measurement(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> -				struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
> -				const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
> -				int pcr, const char *func_data,
> -				bool buf_hash)
> +int process_buffer_measurement(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> +			       struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
> +			       const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
> +			       int pcr, const char *func_data,
> +			       bool buf_hash)
>   {
>   	int ret = 0;
>   	const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM";
> @@ -867,7 +870,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
>   	u32 secid;
>   
>   	if (!ima_policy_flag)
> -		return;
> +		return -ENOENT;
>   
>   	template = ima_template_desc_buf();
>   	if (!template) {
> @@ -889,7 +892,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
>   					secid, 0, func, &pcr, &template,
>   					func_data);
>   		if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE))
> -			return;
> +			return -ENOENT;
>   	}
>   
>   	if (!pcr)
> @@ -937,7 +940,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
>   					func_measure_str(func),
>   					audit_cause, ret, 0, ret);
>   
> -	return;
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   /**
> @@ -977,18 +980,21 @@ void ima_kexec_cmdline(int kernel_fd, const void *buf, int size)
>    * and extend the pcr.  Examples of critical data could be various data
>    * structures, policies, and states stored in kernel memory that can
>    * impact the integrity of the system.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 if the buffer has been successfully measured, a negative value
> + * otherwise.
>    */
> -void ima_measure_critical_data(const char *event_label,
> -			       const char *event_name,
> -			       const void *buf, size_t buf_len,
> -			       bool hash)
> +int ima_measure_critical_data(const char *event_label,
> +			      const char *event_name,
> +			      const void *buf, size_t buf_len,
> +			      bool hash)
>   {
>   	if (!event_name || !event_label || !buf || !buf_len)
> -		return;
> +		return -ENOPARAM;
>   
> -	process_buffer_measurement(&init_user_ns, NULL, buf, buf_len, event_name,
> -				   CRITICAL_DATA, 0, event_label,
> -				   hash);
> +	return process_buffer_measurement(&init_user_ns, NULL, buf, buf_len,
> +					  event_name, CRITICAL_DATA, 0,
> +					  event_label, hash);
>   }
>   
>   static int __init init_ima(void)
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-06 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-05  9:09 [PATCH v3 0/3] ima: Provide more info about buffer measurement Roberto Sassu
2021-07-05  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ima: Introduce ima_get_current_hash_algo() Roberto Sassu
2021-07-05  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ima: Return int in the functions to measure a buffer Roberto Sassu
2021-07-06 19:21   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian [this message]
2021-07-19 20:28   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-07-20 12:38     ` Roberto Sassu
2021-07-20 13:01       ` Mimi Zohar
2021-07-05  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ima: Add digest and digest_len params to " Roberto Sassu
2021-07-06 19:24   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-07-13  2:40   ` Paul Moore
2021-07-19 20:59   ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5bc9d707-b193-6111-fea6-50c70e6f2245@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=prsriva02@gmail.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ima: Return int in the functions to measure a buffer' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).