From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2105C433B4 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDEA60FE4 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230157AbhEJPmS (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 11:42:18 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:55868 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230002AbhEJPmN (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 11:42:13 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14AFXAhf070252; Mon, 10 May 2021 11:41:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=2x1xRo5uCNmSUaQsOyJrca3z7VNagyAI9mU+aKr7H+I=; b=MgHz4GPfulJUUEefaDYWx87eeoR1AYyZygrt/jLefl/i63TNrXa2hkKiZ/mGafbpcf0K qiNvz93J84nSN/Cf5ml5tww2M8V32Zi0pWBgtFFG0K1G6O0OoANo/SKYNX2aM3J810pV JwsNrk3A8kAYErSKpLCcC2Zo1CiRto2jfeOelJCw1zbRJI/HFbTDhdR5Ysdm2+Vk6bQt +mwDnkpNC0ikW23thkaAb8VtO5jwhV7Pfo1feHo/KuWVUihOdB53QItr3P103pXvP9Hl RZn/77PouNXsI8H7CjKGeI8qqMYX/P54JwhfhL7PIAUvbEAMgZCH+yyB+T4y/MjcEDWF pg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38f6683k3t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 May 2021 11:41:02 -0400 Received: from m0098394.ppops.net (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14AFYBMm077630; Mon, 10 May 2021 11:41:01 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38f6683k2b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 May 2021 11:41:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14AFXqJV015563; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:40:59 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 38dj9892kc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 May 2021 15:40:59 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 14AFeU2V27263290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 10 May 2021 15:40:30 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C0011C050; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:40:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F216211C04C; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:40:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-f45666cc-3089-11b2-a85c-c57d1a57929f.ibm.com (unknown [9.160.108.89]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:40:55 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <5ce38d9a4e1e65c0c6546429c14944645072d11a.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ima-evm-utils: Implement function to only create IMA signature From: Mimi Zohar To: Stefan Berger , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Vitaly Chikunov Cc: dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 11:40:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <94771a1d-c48e-3773-8f1f-282519648a73@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210427193133.1718367-1-stefanb@linux.ibm.com> <94771a1d-c48e-3773-8f1f-282519648a73@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-14.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: FFCmbKDq-uHP1RVqn4W91bxkELH6v4vQ X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 26Vs9CvjDKyANvShVkra6CweNYg0sEch X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-10_09:2021-05-10,2021-05-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105100110 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Hi Stefan, Vitaly, On Mon, 2021-05-10 at 09:55 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > I will rebase this series of patches on Vitaly's keyid-related changes, > which are good to have 'underneath'. Sorry for the delay in reviewing/commenting on your patch sets. Hopefully I'll be circling back around to ima-evm-utils later this week, after staging Roberto's EVM kernel patch set. Vitaly, I noticed that your patch set doesn't apply cleanly to next-testing. I haven't taken the time to figure out why yet. thanks, Mimi