From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A2AC5ACAE for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9019C2075C for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="tIa4tKpG" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726928AbfIKJ6u (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 05:58:50 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com ([209.85.167.46]:44759 "EHLO mail-lf1-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726579AbfIKJ6u (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 05:58:50 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id q11so1000439lfc.11 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 02:58:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OpRBkszw25mp0fLeRyh2TfOJBy5aBP0yZdtE3UYaIn0=; b=tIa4tKpGu2lvlqrbZK+ql90Qf50L4HwtMxl7FXHX8p8wrkkwWdTg3F4csGry2o+RDm S11Ivh+Q4acv2tKgMEm4L9dvp/5Zi5/JM+Tew0rVLYzKNUa9oSvXsJ+VAif2D6IE+EFW y7GHsUTdJ92OQL1KTkhAxCu9iiIENgawQIB1LFmzHcKC2v3WTyBUEcAOvFNybpYlBt1T cglzFQis42UKhg4izMPmKd+xzDe6ov5PX/5xjgJFbIgBagWeLmckvPstUVnFs7TdBogN tBdo/FQQk/GsdaFUZqYPxlpHdB5qgGTC0MScEAkptpTj+yGhxhi8YAFFQ7pPrjHVaK2p 2bHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OpRBkszw25mp0fLeRyh2TfOJBy5aBP0yZdtE3UYaIn0=; b=SRVKBooqHrcZfm1NGIOM45cQ72aBI2vws5/1SSGO58XcSxeAT9aCxxRZ9/2znKRXOV 0TIA4veybbbT92R8dBt5xGsyBDd3dUKWgDCGxAXSM6IG+VYlgJyO8wIhufumfRc2ZqZt XdiOFLA9liqJa6NJZZx59Os/v9nxbDrJrmyWzemhzFrlWLxjJkeLxoellnBGE23TnSNM tR5oeWJJlk7RORJbb9KWMLbMtAI8h6SERTm0omo06D3h8zw72RmVtkSCZFLY3aWzvlpH DDm6yuc0QlIIQnGLZHSz0MZWKU6xRPE4XPQi3IBNdlFLtm/aCJ0+r16ksyM4uGN3itAg q0Sg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXJysDY0zNbXDVXY/qXEdLWUXOll70nZKXrxvU57d1QpgZSKq64 3EySPb6LLMecSOb7jri23Urn9tuV8dWDKENVyzNcrQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxMs8S/Wx/3db1xRxgCBPmB0doHxxfRLd4geJFOU/Wcf2aNrd5rqAUSGdtHOxCgrnDcmYGt9DTiy+YxoIkoAG4= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5c11:: with SMTP id r17mr23917542lfp.61.1568195927793; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 02:58:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1567952431.4614.140.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20190910114336.GA7018@linux.intel.com> <20190911092708.GA20023@linux.intel.com> <20190911092926.GA20970@linux.intel.com> <20190911093637.GA21744@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20190911093637.GA21744@linux.intel.com> From: Sumit Garg Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:28:36 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: KEYS-TRUSTED git To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: jejb@linux.ibm.com, Mimi Zohar , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:06, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:29:26AM +0100, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:27:08AM +0100, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:43:36PM +0100, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:57:45AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > > @Jarkko: No worries, I understand the situation. > > > > > > > > I made the call to add them anyway to my TPM tree. > > > > > > Also, > > > > > > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > > > > > > I think I give a shot of doing one more PR to 5.4 because that would > > > help both your and James' work because this is the kind of intersection > > > point betwen them. > > > > Polished short summaries a bit: > > > > 1. Start with capital letter. > > 2. s/tpm2/TPM2/g > > Now also in my next branch. I wait for 24h or so and if no alarms are > rised I'll send a PR. The code changes for the most part mechanically > move stuff, which makes me confident that I can still do a PR with > these changes. Did you notice an issue reported by kbuild test robot? It looks like asymmetric keys based on TPM also relied on old tpm_buf method. So we need to transition them also to use new tpm_buf method. I can work on corresponding changes required but need your help to test it. -Sumit > > /Jarkko