linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Cc: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Bartosz Szczepanek" <bsz@semihalf.com>,
	linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Peter Huewe" <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"LSM List" <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thiébaud Weksteen" <tweek@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/4] tpm: Reserve the TPM final events table
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 22:56:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9GpmK7-kb2GJuhrL2Qau7ebqDdy4-LdwFDmPz-Os0quw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACdnJuvDuw0X9iwEqOu7EjM5ca1f+n7f=xqzrTPS9PyrmqKNHQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 20:04, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 12:15 AM Ard Biesheuvel
> <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > (+ Ingo)
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 21:52, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:07 AM Bartosz Szczepanek <bsz@semihalf.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I may be a little late with this comment, but I've just tested these
> > > > patches on aarch64 platform (from the top of jjs/master) and got
> > > > kernel panic ("Unable to handle kernel read", full log at the end of
> > > > mail). I think there's problem with below call to
> > > > tpm2_calc_event_log_size(), where physical address of efi.tpm_log is
> > > > passed as (void *) and never remapped:
> > >
> > > Yes, it looks like this is just broken. Can you try with the attached patch?
> >
> > I'm a bit uncomfortable with EFI code that is obviously broken and
> > untested being queued for the next merge window in another tree.
>
> The patchset was Cc:ed to linux-efi@. Is there anything else I should
> have done to ensure you picked it up rather than Jarkko?

No, I am not saying it was you who did anything wrong - Jarkko and I
should probably have aligned better. But my own testing wouldn't have
caught this particular issue either (I am still in the process of
getting access to ARM machines with a TPM), so it wouldn't have made a
huge difference in any case.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-02 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-27 20:26 Add support for TCG2 log format on UEFI systems Matthew Garrett
2019-02-27 20:26 ` [PATCH V5 1/4] tpm: Abstract crypto agile event size calculations Matthew Garrett
2019-02-27 20:26 ` [PATCH V5 2/4] tpm: Reserve the TPM final events table Matthew Garrett
2019-04-30 13:07   ` Bartosz Szczepanek
2019-04-30 19:51     ` Matthew Garrett
2019-04-30 21:35       ` Matthew Garrett
2019-05-02  6:45         ` Bartosz Szczepanek
2019-05-02 18:07           ` Matthew Garrett
2019-05-06 19:20             ` Bartosz Szczepanek
2019-05-02  7:14       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-02 18:04         ` Matthew Garrett
2019-05-02 20:56           ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2019-05-03  6:02           ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-03  6:12             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-05-03  5:51         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-05-02  8:32     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-05-02 18:03       ` Matthew Garrett
2019-05-03  5:49         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-27 20:26 ` [PATCH V5 3/4] tpm: Append the final event log to the TPM event log Matthew Garrett
2019-02-27 20:26 ` [PATCH V5 4/4] efi: Attempt to get the TCG2 event log in the boot stub Matthew Garrett
2019-03-14  9:35 ` Add support for TCG2 log format on UEFI systems Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-14 21:04   ` Matthew Garrett
2019-03-15 11:47     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-04-01 23:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-04-02  3:32   ` Matthew Garrett
2019-04-02 13:07     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-04-02 17:15       ` Matthew Garrett
2019-04-03 17:50         ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu9GpmK7-kb2GJuhrL2Qau7ebqDdy4-LdwFDmPz-Os0quw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bsz@semihalf.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@google.com \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=tweek@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).