archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jessica Yu <>
To: Stefan Berger <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] certs: Add support for using elliptic curve keys for signing modules
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:58:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIAhXfFiHjzPU19U@gunter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

+++ Stefan Berger [21/04/21 08:54 -0400]:
>On 4/21/21 8:52 AM, Jessica Yu wrote:
>>+++ Stefan Berger [20/04/21 17:02 -0400]:
>>>On 4/20/21 10:03 AM, Jessica Yu wrote:
>>>>+++ Stefan Berger [08/04/21 11:24 -0400]:
>>>>>diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c 
>>>>>index 967329e0a07b..2546ec6a0505 100644
>>>>>--- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c
>>>>>+++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c
>>>>>@@ -269,6 +269,10 @@ int pkcs7_sig_note_pkey_algo(void 
>>>>>*context, size_t hdrlen,
>>>>>        ctx->sinfo->sig->pkey_algo = "rsa";
>>>>>        ctx->sinfo->sig->encoding = "pkcs1";
>>>>>        break;
>>>>>+    case OID_id_ecdsa_with_sha256:
>>>>>+        ctx->sinfo->sig->pkey_algo = "ecdsa";
>>>>>+        ctx->sinfo->sig->encoding = "x962";
>>>>>+        break;
>>>>Hi Stefan,
>>>>Does CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY_TYPE_ECDSA have a dependency on 
>>>You are right, per the code above it does have a dependency on 
>>>SHA256. ECDSA is using NIST p384 (secp384r1) for signing and per 
>>>my tests it can be paired with all the sha hashes once the code 
>>>above is extended. Now when it comes to module signing, should we 
>>>pair it with a particular hash? I am not currently aware of a 
>>>guidance document on this but sha256 and sha384 seem to be good 
>>>choices these days, so maybe selecting ECDSA module signing should 
>>>have a 'depends on' on these?
>>Yeah, I would tack on the 'depends on' until the code above has been
>>extended to cover more sha hashes - because currently if someone
>>builds and signs a bunch of modules with an ECDSA key, they will fail
>>to load if they picked something other than sha256. I am unfortunately
>>not knowledgeable enough to suggest an official guideline on choice of
>>hash, but for now it is reasonable to have a 'depends on' for which
>>hashes the code currently supports, so that users don't run into
>>module loading rejection issues.
>I was going to repost this series now with the additional OIDs 
>supported above and a recommendation to use sha384 in the help text 
>for ECDSA-signed modules, but not enforcing this but instead trusting 
>the user that they will choose a reasonable hash (probably >= sha256).

OK, that sounds good to me.

Thanks Stefan!

      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-21 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-08 15:24 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for ECDSA-signed kernel modules Stefan Berger
2021-04-08 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] certs: Trigger creation of RSA module signing key if it's not an RSA key Stefan Berger
2021-04-08 17:15   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-04-08 19:19     ` Stefan Berger
2021-04-08 21:34       ` Mimi Zohar
2021-04-08 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] certs: Add support for using elliptic curve keys for signing modules Stefan Berger
2021-04-08 17:15   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-04-20 14:03   ` Jessica Yu
2021-04-20 21:02     ` Stefan Berger
2021-04-21 12:52       ` Jessica Yu
2021-04-21 12:54         ` Stefan Berger
2021-04-21 12:58           ` Jessica Yu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YIAhXfFiHjzPU19U@gunter \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).