From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6199C2D0DB for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4C8206D5 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728893AbgAaPVu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:21:50 -0500 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210]:2342 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728860AbgAaPVt (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:21:49 -0500 Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5C4899BEC3CCF11B7645; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:21:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fraeml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.50) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:21:47 +0000 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) by fraeml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:21:46 +0100 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:21:46 +0100 From: Roberto Sassu To: "zohar@linux.ibm.com" , "jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com" , "james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com" , "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" CC: "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Silviu Vlasceanu Subject: RE: [PATCH 8/8] ima: switch to ima_hash_algo for boot aggregate Thread-Topic: [PATCH 8/8] ima: switch to ima_hash_algo for boot aggregate Thread-Index: AQHV1TQ/cbv5dz78j0O1U+btlk5ShagE6FxQ Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:21:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20200127170443.21538-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> <20200127170443.21538-9-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20200127170443.21538-9-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.220.96.108] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Roberto Sassu > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 6:05 PM > To: zohar@linux.ibm.com; jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com; > james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com; linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > Silviu Vlasceanu ; Roberto Sassu > > Subject: [PATCH 8/8] ima: switch to ima_hash_algo for boot aggregate I will remove this patch from the patch set. [PATCH v3 1/2] ima: support calculating the boot aggregate based on non-SHA1 algorithms [PATCH v3 2/2] ima: support calculating the boot_aggregate based on different TPM banks by Mimi will provide similar functionality. Roberto HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063 Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli