From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Changes for module stacking in Linux integrity
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 15:18:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b62729bd-08c1-7f8c-3564-fa63af2a9dea@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cfb137c-6066-c1df-1619-39793b0d2841.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
I am putting a real effort into getting the current LSM stacking
patch set into -next for 5.14. There are a number of reasons, ranging
from moving onto the next round of changes to pressure on other tasks
that have been piling up behind it. It would be very helpful if I
could get either sign-off-by: or significant comments on the v26
IMA/EVM changes.
Thank you.
parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-17 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <9cfb137c-6066-c1df-1619-39793b0d2841.ref@schaufler-ca.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b62729bd-08c1-7f8c-3564-fa63af2a9dea@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).