From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EF3C433F5 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236880AbhLPViT (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:38:19 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:8212 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236820AbhLPViT (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:38:19 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1BGKQQnX024494; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:38:07 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=0pyn4IWIx1Fu0WZKd1EhQmwziqA3HmO1dC0kUFj5hvc=; b=PupN7oOg6+KV4Ir1DW0oOcRQRTIHIqTDgULwVLU/KzRdRd+IvAfYDOFQq6uvZ9bCxkHr yqHi/LRJjMOHD7QM6bbJEtQiTuxdKmPQy+Kha/jQ0zdjZCdXG0xgu/yaPWD8Dz6PNA84 v9eLV67HPiCibf2iEkQYn+pzeVqvtu87ax1QhcFs0JMShvRJ0x4i/DIKy3MsEGlgfgbE v9tMSKcOj4B99zY5i5Avyntb0mMtYW7Jvr/NrcQmssgoaK2HZASDb2E2Q6RZJoX9dWKn yHIaeHtn7dPqttQp/RaPlkNRgmnNnW3FmWJz67pwW9SdyDewM66KMuBO1B4/ILsIXTg+ kQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3cyq8v51ht-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:38:07 +0000 Received: from m0127361.ppops.net (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 1BGLREPs018033; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:38:06 GMT Received: from ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (1a.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.26]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3cyq8v51h7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:38:06 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1BGLWIZ4005346; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:38:05 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3cy76wvkvm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:38:05 +0000 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 1BGLc4wi20971896 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:38:04 GMT Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD257805C; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:38:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AF678067; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:38:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.47.158.152] (unknown [9.47.158.152]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:38:03 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:38:02 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/14] ima: Setup securityfs for IMA namespace Content-Language: en-US To: Christian Brauner , Stefan Berger Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com, serge@hallyn.com, containers@lists.linux.dev, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com, mpeters@redhat.com, lhinds@redhat.com, lsturman@redhat.com, puiterwi@redhat.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, jamjoom@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul@paul-moore.com, rgb@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, James Bottomley References: <20211216054323.1707384-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20211216054323.1707384-15-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20211216135100.43suxkutyuwac7yh@wittgenstein> From: Stefan Berger In-Reply-To: <20211216135100.43suxkutyuwac7yh@wittgenstein> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: fQIvGATwnszgSkOAlMn--SduAhzzpVVX X-Proofpoint-GUID: o3WKyDHTbZUbfQu9X3ONmUopjWHAhjn2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2021-12-16_08,2021-12-16_01,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2112160115 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On 12/16/21 08:51, Christian Brauner wrote: > >> +int ima_fs_ns_init(struct user_namespace *user_ns, struct dentry *root) >> { >> struct ima_namespace *ns = user_ns->ima_ns; >> - struct dentry *ima_dir; >> + struct dentry *int_dir; >> + struct dentry *ima_dir = NULL; >> struct dentry *ima_symlink = NULL; >> struct dentry *binary_runtime_measurements = NULL; >> struct dentry *ascii_runtime_measurements = NULL; >> struct dentry *runtime_measurements_count = NULL; >> struct dentry *violations = NULL; >> >> - ima_dir = securityfs_create_dir("ima", integrity_dir); >> + /* FIXME: update when evm and integrity are namespaced */ >> + if (user_ns != &init_user_ns) { >> + int_dir = >> + securityfs_create_dir("integrity", root); >> + if (IS_ERR(int_dir)) >> + return -1; > That should probably be return PTR_ERR(int_dir) That's actually from current usptream ( https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c#L457 ) The question is then whether at the end it should also return something else than what it currently returns: out:     securityfs_remove(violations);     [...]     securityfs_remove(ima_policy);     return -1;