IOMMU Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Makarand Pawagi <makarand.pawagi@nxp.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] ACPI/IORT: Make iort_match_node_callback walk the ACPI namespace for NC
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 20:48:52 +0800
Message-ID: <04f3d761-6ee0-6062-1970-3d5f506d8305@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200709092156.GB18149@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On 2020/7/9 17:21, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:22:00PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Hi Robin,
>>
>> On 2020/7/2 0:12, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> On 2020-06-30 14:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>> On 2020/6/30 18:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:06:41AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> For devices that aren't described in the DSDT - IORT translations
>>>>>>> are determined by their ACPI parent device. Do you see/Have you
>>>>>>> found any issue with this approach ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The spec says "Describes the IO relationships between devices
>>>>>> represented in the ACPI namespace.", and in section 3.1.1.3 Named
>>>>>> component node, it says:
>>>>>
>>>>> PCI devices aren't necessarily described in the ACPI namespace and we
>>>>> still use IORT to describe them - through the RC node.
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Named component nodes are used to describe devices that are also
>>>>>> included in the Differentiated System Description Table (DSDT). See
>>>>>> [ACPI]."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So from my understanding, the IORT spec for now, can only do ID
>>>>>> translations for devices in the DSDT.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you can read this multiple ways but this patch does not
>>>>> change this concept. What changes, is applying parent's node IORT
>>>>> mapping to child nodes with no associated DSDT nodes, it is the
>>>>> same thing we do with PCI and the _DMA method - we could update
>>>>> the wording in the specs if that clarifies but I don't think this
>>>>> deliberately disregards the specifications.
>>>>
>>>> I agree, but it's better to update the wording of the spec.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For a platform device, if I use its parent's full path name for
>>>>>>>> its named component entry, then it will match, but this will violate
>>>>>>>> the IORT spec.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you elaborate on this please I don't get the point you
>>>>>>> are making.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For example, device A is not described in DSDT so can't represent
>>>>>> as a NC node in IORT. Device B can be described in DSDT and it
>>>>>> is the parent of device A, so device B can be represented in IORT
>>>>>> with memory access properties and node flags with Substream width
>>>>>> and Stall supported info.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When we trying to translate device A's ID, we reuse all the memory
>>>>>> access properties and node flags from its parent (device B), but
>>>>>> will it the same?
>>>>>
>>>>> I assume so why wouldn't it be ? Why would be describe them in
>>>>> a parent-child relationship if that's not how the system looks like
>>>>> in HW ?
>>>>
>>>> The point I'm making is that I'm not sure all the memory access and
>>>> stall properties are the same for the parent and the device itself.
>>>
>>> Is that even a valid case though? The principal thing we want to
>>> accommodate here is when device B *is* the one accessing memory, either
>>> because it is a bridge with device A sat behind it, or because device A
>>> is actually just some logical function or subset of physical device B.
>>
>> Thanks for the clarify, for CCA attributes, child device should be the
>> same as its parent and that was written in the ACPI spec, so it's better
>> to make it clear for other properties in the spec as well.
>>
>>>
>>> If the topology is such that device A is a completely independent device
>>> with its own path to memory such that it could have different
>>> properties, I would expect that it *should* be described in DSDT, and I
>>> can't easily think of a good reason why it wouldn't be. I'm also
>>> struggling to imagine how it might even have an ID that had to be
>>> interpreted in the context of device B if it wasn't one of the cases
>>> above :/
>>>
>>> I don't doubt that people could - or maybe even have - come up with crap
>>> DSDT bindings that don't represent the hardware sufficiently accurately,
>>> but I'm not sure that should be IORT's problem...
>>
>> As I said in previous email, I'm not against this patch, and seems
>> have no regressions for platforms that using named component node
>> such as D05/D06 (I will test it shortly to make sure), but it's better
>> to update the wording of the spec (even after this patch set is merged).
> 
> Have you managed to test this series ?

Sorry, I forgot to reply the email after the testing, adding this patch
set on top of 5.8-rc3 and test it on D06, it worked well, and I printed
every match device's name to confirm that there are no regressions.

Thanks
Hanjun

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply index

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-21 12:59 [PATCH 00/12] ACPI/OF: Upgrade MSI/IOMMU ID mapping APIs Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 12:59 ` [PATCH 01/12] ACPI/IORT: Make iort_match_node_callback walk the ACPI namespace for NC Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 12:59 ` [PATCH 02/12] ACPI/IORT: Make iort_get_device_domain IRQ domain agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 19:56   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-05-21 12:59 ` [PATCH 03/12] ACPI/IORT: Make iort_msi_map_rid() PCI agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 13:00 ` [PATCH 04/12] ACPI/IORT: Remove useless PCI bus walk Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 13:00 ` [PATCH 05/12] ACPI/IORT: Add an input ID to acpi_dma_configure() Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 13:00 ` [PATCH 06/12] of/iommu: Make of_map_rid() PCI agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 22:47   ` Rob Herring
2020-06-04 14:27     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 13:00 ` [PATCH 07/12] of/device: Add input id to of_dma_configure() Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 23:02   ` Rob Herring
2020-06-04 14:49     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 13:00 ` [PATCH 08/12] of/irq: make of_msi_map_get_device_domain() bus agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 19:57   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-05-21 13:00 ` [PATCH 09/12] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add msi-map device-tree binding for fsl-mc bus Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 23:10   ` Rob Herring
2020-05-22  9:42     ` Robin Murphy
2020-05-22  9:57       ` Diana Craciun OSS
2020-05-22 14:08         ` Rob Herring
2020-05-22 14:34           ` Robin Murphy
2020-05-22 14:02       ` Rob Herring
2020-05-22 15:38         ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-05-21 13:00 ` [PATCH 10/12] of/irq: Make of_msi_map_rid() PCI bus agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 23:17   ` Rob Herring
2020-06-04 15:08     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 13:00 ` [PATCH 11/12] bus/fsl-mc: Refactor the MSI domain creation in the DPRC driver Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 13:00 ` [PATCH 12/12] bus: fsl-mc: Add ACPI support for fsl-mc Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-05-21 15:03   ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-05-22  5:32     ` Makarand Pawagi
2020-05-22  9:53       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-06-19  8:20 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] ACPI/OF: Upgrade MSI/IOMMU ID mapping APIs Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-06-19  8:20   ` [PATCH v2 01/12] ACPI/IORT: Make iort_match_node_callback walk the ACPI namespace for NC Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-06-29  4:24     ` Hanjun Guo
2020-06-29  9:05       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-06-30  3:06         ` Hanjun Guo
2020-06-30 10:24           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-06-30 13:04             ` Hanjun Guo
2020-07-01 16:12               ` Robin Murphy
2020-07-02  8:22                 ` Hanjun Guo
2020-07-09  9:21                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-07-09 12:48                     ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2020-08-18  0:49                   ` Hanjun Guo
2020-06-19  8:20   ` [PATCH v2 02/12] ACPI/IORT: Make iort_get_device_domain IRQ domain agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-06-19  8:20   ` [PATCH v2 03/12] ACPI/IORT: Make iort_msi_map_rid() PCI agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-07-15  9:15     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-07-21 14:59     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-27  6:06       ` [EXT] " Makarand Pawagi
2020-06-19  8:20   ` [PATCH v2 04/12] ACPI/IORT: Remove useless PCI bus walk Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-06-19  8:20   ` [PATCH v2 05/12] ACPI/IORT: Add an input ID to acpi_dma_configure() Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-07-09  9:35     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-07-15  9:13       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-07-28 12:48         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-07-28 13:00           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-19  8:20   ` [PATCH v2 06/12] of/iommu: Make of_map_rid() PCI agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-06-22 13:26     ` Joerg Roedel
2020-07-13 23:57     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-19  8:20   ` [PATCH v2 07/12] of/device: Add input id to of_dma_configure() Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-06-30 21:50     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-19  8:20   ` [PATCH v2 08/12] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add msi-map device-tree binding for fsl-mc bus Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-06-30 21:55     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-19  8:20   ` [PATCH v2 09/12] of/irq: make of_msi_map_get_device_domain() bus agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-06-30 21:50     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-19  8:20   ` [PATCH v2 10/12] of/irq: Make of_msi_map_rid() PCI " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-06-30 21:56     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-19  8:20   ` [PATCH v2 11/12] bus/fsl-mc: Refactor the MSI domain creation in the DPRC driver Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-07-15 13:05     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-19  8:20   ` [PATCH v2 12/12] bus: fsl-mc: Add ACPI support for fsl-mc Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-07-01 16:55     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-07-09  9:19       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-07-09  9:26         ` [EXT] " Makarand Pawagi
2020-07-09 10:14           ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-07-09 10:37             ` Makarand Pawagi
2020-07-09 10:39               ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-07-09 10:47               ` Diana Craciun OSS
2020-07-09 10:52                 ` Makarand Pawagi
2020-07-15 10:06                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-07-16  3:23                     ` Makarand Pawagi
2020-07-16  7:57                       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-20 16:54   ` [PATCH v2 00/12] ACPI/OF: Upgrade MSI/IOMMU ID mapping APIs Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-07-21  4:28     ` [EXT] " Makarand Pawagi
2020-07-28 17:01   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=04f3d761-6ee0-6062-1970-3d5f506d8305@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=makarand.pawagi@nxp.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

IOMMU Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/0 linux-iommu/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-iommu linux-iommu/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu \
		iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
	public-inbox-index linux-iommu

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.linux-foundation.lists.iommu


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git